Display options
Cite
Dienemann J, Shaffer C. Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria. J Prof Nurs. 1992;8(3):148-54doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s.
Dienemann, J., & Shaffer, C. (1992). Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria. Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 8(3), 148-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s
Dienemann, J, and Shaffer, C. "Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria." Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing vol. 8,3 (1992): 148-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s
Dienemann J, Shaffer C. Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria. J Prof Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):148-54. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s. PMID: 1634655.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Prof Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):148-54. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s.

Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing

J Dienemann, C Shaffer

Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.

PMID: 1634655 DOI: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s

Abstract

This study investigated the consensus among schools of nursing in (1) using the eight elements of effective performance appraisal identified in the literature and (2) identification of domains, dimensions, and subdimensions of faculty performance. Content analysis was done of actual policies, procedures, and forms from 86 schools with graduate programs. Performance appraisal systems were found to be in an early stage of development. There was substantive agreement on teaching, service, and research as domains, with 25% or fewer schools also using faculty development, professional practice, and/or administration. There was less consensus as to the attributes of domains. Specific dimensions and their assignment to domains, as well as recommendations to guide future development, are discussed.

Similar articles

Strumpf NE, Naegle MA, Fagin CM, Aiken LH.
Nurs Outlook. 2021 Jul-Aug;69(4):530. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Jun 03.
PMID: 34092369

Show all 52 similar articles

MeSH terms

Publication Types