Display options
Cite
Mulder H, Hoofs H, Verhagen J, et al. Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds. Front Psychol. 2014;5:733doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733.
Mulder, H., Hoofs, H., Verhagen, J., van der Veen, I., & Leseman, P. P. (2014). Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds. Frontiers in psychology, 5733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733
Mulder, Hanna, et al. "Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds." Frontiers in psychology vol. 5 (2014): 733. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733
Mulder H, Hoofs H, Verhagen J, van der Veen I, Leseman PP. Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds. Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 22;5:733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25101015; PMCID: PMC4106275.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 22;5:733. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733. eCollection 2014.

Psychometric properties and convergent and predictive validity of an executive function test battery for two-year-olds.

Frontiers in psychology

Hanna Mulder, Huub Hoofs, Josje Verhagen, Ineke van der Veen, Paul P M Leseman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Special Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
  2. Department of Special Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands ; Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
  3. Kohnstamm Institute, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.

PMID: 25101015 PMCID: PMC4106275 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00733

Abstract

Executive function (EF) is an important predictor of numerous developmental outcomes, such as academic achievement and behavioral adjustment. Although a plethora of measurement instruments exists to assess executive function in children, only few of these are suitable for toddlers, and even fewer have undergone psychometric evaluation. The present study evaluates the psychometric properties and validity of an assessment battery for measuring EF in two-year-olds. A sample of 2437 children were administered the assessment battery at a mean age of 2;4 years (SD = 0;3 years) in a large-scale field study. Measures of both hot EF (snack and gift delay tasks) and cool EF (six boxes, memory for location, and visual search task) were included. Confirmatory Factor Analyses showed that a two-factor hot and cool EF model fitted the data better than a one-factor model. Measurement invariance was supported across groups differing in age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), home language, and test setting. Criterion and convergent validity were evaluated by examining relationships between EF and age, gender, SES, home language, and parent and teacher reports of children's attention and inhibitory control. Predictive validity of the test battery was investigated by regressing children's pre-academic skills and behavioral problems at age three on the latent hot and cool EF factors at age 2 years. The test battery showed satisfactory psychometric quality and criterion, convergent, and predictive validity. Whereas cool EF predicted both pre-academic skills and behavior problems 1 year later, hot EF predicted behavior problems only. These results show that EF can be assessed with psychometrically sound instruments in children as young as 2 years, and that EF tasks can be reliably applied in large scale field research. The current instruments offer new opportunities for investigating EF in early childhood, and for evaluating interventions targeted at improving EF from a young age.

Keywords: delay of gratification; executive function; psychometrics; selective attention; toddlers; validity; working memory

References

  1. Dev Psychol. 2002 Mar;38(2):313-26 - PubMed
  2. Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;31(Pt 1):70-87 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):436-52 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 16;110(29):12138-43 - PubMed
  5. Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):208-21 - PubMed
  6. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Feb;20(2):152-6 - PubMed
  7. Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):362-78 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):580-92 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Feb;81(2):194-215 - PubMed
  10. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Dec;128:105-19 - PubMed
  11. Child Dev. 2002 Jul-Aug;73(4):1238-48 - PubMed
  12. Science. 2006 Jun 30;312(5782):1900-2 - PubMed
  13. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010;35(6):679-97 - PubMed
  14. Neuropsychology. 2004 Oct;18(4):673-8 - PubMed
  15. Dev Neuropsychol. 2011;36(2):162-80 - PubMed
  16. J Cogn Dev. 2011 Jan 1;12(2):169-193 - PubMed
  17. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037-78 - PubMed
  18. Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1176-1191 - PubMed
  19. Dev Psychol. 2007 Nov;43(6):1447-59 - PubMed
  20. Child Dev. 2005 May-Jun;76(3):554-67 - PubMed
  21. Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):595-616 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):306-17 - PubMed
  23. Dev Psychol. 2004 Nov;40(6):1105-22 - PubMed
  24. Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;44(2):575-87 - PubMed
  25. J Pers. 2003 Dec;71(6):1113-43 - PubMed
  26. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100 - PubMed
  27. Dev Sci. 2005 Jan;8(1):74-87 - PubMed
  28. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):567-79 - PubMed
  29. Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):134-50 - PubMed
  30. J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):386-404 - PubMed
  31. Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Jul;29(3):386-401 - PubMed
  32. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Sep;11(9):651-9 - PubMed
  33. Science. 2007 Nov 30;318(5855):1387-8 - PubMed
  34. Dev Psychol. 2007 Jul;43(4):947-59 - PubMed
  35. J Pers. 2003 Dec;71(6):1087-112 - PubMed
  36. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;52(1):33-46 - PubMed
  37. Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;134(1):31-60 - PubMed
  38. Dev Psychol. 2004 Sep;40(5):836-51 - PubMed
  39. Dev Neuropsychol. 2005;28(2):645-68 - PubMed
  40. Dev Psychol. 2009 Jul;45(4):988-1008 - PubMed
  41. Dev Psychol. 2011 Jul;47(4):905-15 - PubMed
  42. Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(6):713-36 - PubMed
  43. Child Dev. 2007 Mar-Apr;78(2):647-63 - PubMed
  44. Dev Psychol. 2000 Mar;36(2):220-32 - PubMed
  45. Dev Sci. 2007 Jul;10(4):464-80 - PubMed
  46. Dev Sci. 2008 Mar;11(2):282-98 - PubMed
  47. Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Summer;20(3):899-911 - PubMed
  48. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;21(1):8-14 - PubMed
  49. Child Neuropsychol. 2011;17(1):51-66 - PubMed
  50. Child Neuropsychol. 2011;17(6):564-79 - PubMed
  51. Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Mar;82(Pt 1):100-19 - PubMed
  52. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1997;62(4):i-v, 1-208 - PubMed
  53. Dev Sci. 2004 Feb;7(1):116-30 - PubMed
  54. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;41(1):43-56 - PubMed
  55. Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):605-19 - PubMed

Publication Types