Display options
Share it on

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 27;15:75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0739-x.

Health providers' perspectives on delivering public health services under the contract service policy in rural China: evidence from Xinjian County.

BMC health services research

Huixuan Zhou, Weijun Zhang, Shengfa Zhang, Fugang Wang, You Zhong, Linni Gu, Zhiyong Qu, Xiaoyun Liang, Zhihong Sa, Xiaohua Wang, Donghua Tian

Affiliations

  1. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  2. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  3. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  4. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  5. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  6. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  7. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  8. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  9. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  10. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].
  11. China Institute of Health, School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekou Wai Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100875, China. [email protected].

PMID: 25889866 PMCID: PMC4348399 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0739-x

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To effectively provide public health care for rural residents, the Ministry of Health formally unveiled the contract service policy in rural China in April 2013. As the counterpart to family medicine in some developed countries, the contract service established a compact between village doctors and local governments and a service agreement between doctors and their patients. This study is a rare attempt to explore the perspectives of health providers on the contract service policy, and investigate the demand side's attitude toward the public health services delivered under the contract policy. This evidence from Xinjian County, Jiangxi Province, the first and most representative pilot site of the contract service, could serve as a reference for policymakers to understand the initial effects of the policy, whereby they can regulate and amend some items before extending it to the whole country.

METHODS: Official documents were collected and semi-structured interviews with human resources and villagers in Xinjian County were conducted in September 2013. A purposive sampling method was used, and eight towns from the total 18 towns in Xinjian County were selected. Ultimately, eight managers (one in each township health center), 20 village doctors from eight clinics, and 11 villagers were interviewed. A thematic approach was used to analyze the data, which reflected the people's experiences brought about by the implementation of the contract service policy.

RESULTS: While the contract service actually promoted the supply side to provide more public health services to the villagers and contracted patients felt satisfied with the doctor-patient relationship, most health providers complained about the heavy workload, insufficient remuneration, staff shortage, lack of official identity and ineffective performance appraisal, in addition to contempt from some villagers and supervisors after the implementation of the contract service.

CONCLUSIONS: Contract service is a crucial step for the government to promote public health services in rural areas. To inspire the positive perspective and optimal work performance of the health workforce, it is imperative for the Chinese government to fortify financial support to health providers, adopt an advanced management model and escalate administrative capacity.

References

  1. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Sep;22(3):168-73 - PubMed
  2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:115 - PubMed
  3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:156 - PubMed
  4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD002215 - PubMed
  5. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:58 - PubMed
  6. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006 Nov;19(3):385-7 - PubMed
  7. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Aug;47(421):481-6 - PubMed
  8. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 15;353(11):1165-70 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2003 Sep 25;425(6956):333 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 2008 Oct 25;372(9648):1493-501 - PubMed
  11. Health Policy Plan. 2013 Dec;28(8):809-24 - PubMed
  12. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Feb;53(487):155-6 - PubMed
  13. Rural Remote Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;10(1):1319 - PubMed
  14. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015 Jan-Mar;30(1):E42-55 - PubMed
  15. Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1331 - PubMed
  16. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:230 - PubMed
  17. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP1827-36 - PubMed
  18. Health Econ. 2009 Jan;18(1):103-19 - PubMed
  19. Hum Resour Health. 2011 Dec 19;9:30 - PubMed
  20. Nurs Inq. 2012 Mar;19(1):39-50 - PubMed
  21. Health Policy. 2010 Oct;97(2-3):259-66 - PubMed
  22. Lancet. 2011 Feb 26;377(9767):769-81 - PubMed
  23. Lancet. 2012 Mar 3;379(9818):833-42 - PubMed
  24. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Nov 1;91(11):834-40 - PubMed
  25. Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Oct;82(10):724-31; discussion 732 - PubMed
  26. J Health Econ. 2001 Sep;20(5):677-701 - PubMed
  27. Hum Resour Health. 2013 May 04;11:17 - PubMed
  28. Health Policy. 1993 Sep;25(1-2):39-50 - PubMed
  29. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jun;54(11):1691-8 - PubMed
  30. Med Educ. 2006 May;40(5):405-14 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 2008 Feb 23;371(9613):668-74 - PubMed
  32. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:620 - PubMed
  33. Health Stat Q. 2007 Winter;(36):73-83 - PubMed
  34. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:419 - PubMed
  35. Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 19;7:14 - PubMed
  36. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):952-63 - PubMed
  37. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1991;5(4):331-8 - PubMed
  38. Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jan 1;91(1):64-9 - PubMed
  39. Med Hist. 1968 Apr;12(2):109-21 - PubMed
  40. J Nurs Manag. 2009 Dec;17(8):994-1001 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types