Display options
Share it on

JMIR Cancer. 2019 Jan 30;5(1):e11556. doi: 10.2196/11556.

Evaluation and Implementation of ListeningTime: A Web-Based Preparatory Communication Tool for Elderly Patients With Cancer and Their Health Care Providers.

JMIR cancer

Janneke Noordman, Jeanine A Driesenaar, Inge R van Bruinessen, Johanneke Ea Portielje, Sandra van Dulmen

Affiliations

  1. Nivel: Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  2. Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  3. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
  4. Department of Oncology, Hagaziekenhuis, Den Haag, Netherlands.
  5. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.

PMID: 30698525 PMCID: PMC6372931 DOI: 10.2196/11556

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective patient-provider communication is an important condition to deliver optimal care and it supports patients in coping with their disease. The complex and emotionally loaded setting of oncology care challenges both health care providers (HCPs) and patients in reaching effective communication. ListeningTime is developed for elderly patients with cancer and their oncological HCPs to help them (better) prepare the clinical encounter and overcome communication barriers. ListeningTime is a Web-based preparatory communication tool including modeling videos and has an audio-facility to listen back to recorded encounters.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the usability, perceived usefulness, and actual use of ListeningTime, through the eyes of elderly patients with cancer and their oncological HCPs. If highly rated, the ultimate goal is to make ListeningTime publicly available.

METHODS: First, members of a panel of elderly cancer survivors and patients (age ≥65 years) were approached to evaluate ListeningTime through a Web-based questionnaire. The usability and perceived usefulness were assessed. Second, ListeningTime was evaluated in real-life practice through a pilot study in 3 Dutch hospitals. In these hospitals, elderly patients with cancer and their oncological HCPs were approached to evaluate ListeningTime through a similar Web-based questionnaire, measuring the perceived usefulness. In addition, we examined log files and user statistics to get insight into how the program was used.

RESULTS: A total of 30 cancer survivors or patients from the patient panel, and 17 patients and 8 HCPs from the hospitals, evaluated ListeningTime. Overall, both panel members and hospital patients were positive about the ListeningTime website, audio-facility, and video fragments. Some patients suggested improvements with respect to the actors' performances in the video fragments and believed that ListeningTime is mainly suitable for non experienced patients. HCPs were also positive about ListeningTime; they valued the video fragments for patients and the audio-facility for patients and themselves. However, providers did not relisten their own recorded encounters. Patients did use the audio-facility to relisten their encounters.

CONCLUSIONS: ListeningTime was highly rated, both by patients and their oncological HCPs. As a result, the video fragments of ListeningTime are now made publicly available for elderly patients with cancer through the Dutch website "kanker.nl."

©Janneke Noordman, Jeanine A Driesenaar, Inge R van Bruinessen, Johanneke EA Portielje, Sandra van Dulmen. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (http://cancer.jmir.org), 30.01.2019.

Keywords: Web-based tool; audio-facility; cancer patients; communication; health care providers; internet; videos

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(6):748-57 - PubMed
  2. Gerontologist. 2003 Mar;43 Spec No 1:57-67 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 1;22(21):4401-9 - PubMed
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11 - PubMed
  5. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):899-910 - PubMed
  6. Health Commun. 2006;20(2):123-9 - PubMed
  7. Clin Interv Aging. 2007;2(3):453-67 - PubMed
  8. AIDS. 2009 Jan 2;23(1):107-15 - PubMed
  9. BMC Nurs. 2009 Jan 19;8:1 - PubMed
  10. J R Soc Med. 2009 Jun;102(6):235-43 - PubMed
  11. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 May;79(2):218-24 - PubMed
  12. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Dec;26(4):670-81 - PubMed
  13. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):287-93 - PubMed
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111 - PubMed
  15. Psychooncology. 2013 May;22(5):961-77 - PubMed
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):406-13 - PubMed
  17. Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1273-82 - PubMed
  18. Psychooncology. 2013 Nov;22(11):2487-95 - PubMed
  19. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jun;95(3):297-304 - PubMed
  20. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3143-51 - PubMed
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:491 - PubMed
  22. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 06;3(4):e59 - PubMed
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 24;17(4):e104 - PubMed
  24. J Health Commun. 2015;20(9):1067-83 - PubMed
  25. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Apr 12;5(2):e60 - PubMed
  26. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 25;18(7):e208 - PubMed
  27. Psychooncology. 2017 Jul;26(7):943-950 - PubMed
  28. Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 03;8:72 - PubMed
  29. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2262-2268 - PubMed
  30. J Health Commun. 2018;23(2):170-180 - PubMed

Publication Types