Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 67 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction.

International journal of women's health

Patte C, Deruelle P.
PMID: 26648758
Int J Womens Health. 2015 Nov 12;7:889-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S62372. eCollection 2015.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor is a major issue in pregnancy management. Finding strategies to increase rate and decrease time to vaginal delivery is an important goal, but maternal or neonatal safety must remain the primary objective. Misoprostol is a...

Cite
Patte C, Deruelle P. A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:889-99doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S62372.
Patte, C., & Deruelle, P. (2015). A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction. International journal of women's health, 7889-99. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S62372
Patte, Charlotte, and Deruelle, Philippe. "A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction." International journal of women's health vol. 7 (2015): 889-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S62372
Patte C, Deruelle P. A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction. Int J Womens Health. 2015 Nov 12;7:889-99. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S62372. eCollection 2015. PMID: 26648758; PMCID: PMC4648618.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Is induction of labor with continuous release dinoprostone vaginal pessary a viable option in patients with preeclampsia?.

Primary care update for Ob/Gyns

Ascher-Walsh C, Tharakan T, Baxi L.
PMID: 10838342
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00097-3.

Objective: To evaluate the role of dinoprostone vaginal pessary (DVP) for induction of labor in preeclampsia.Methods: This is a prospective review of 94 patients with preeclampsia, who delivered from July 1995 to December 1996 at a university center. Of...

Cite
Ascher-Walsh C, Tharakan T, Baxi L. Is induction of labor with continuous release dinoprostone vaginal pessary a viable option in patients with preeclampsia?. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):183doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00097-3.
Ascher-Walsh, C., Tharakan, T., & Baxi, L. (1998). Is induction of labor with continuous release dinoprostone vaginal pessary a viable option in patients with preeclampsia?. Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 5(4), 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00097-3
Ascher-Walsh, et al. "Is induction of labor with continuous release dinoprostone vaginal pessary a viable option in patients with preeclampsia?." Primary care update for Ob/Gyns vol. 5,4 (1998): 183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00097-3
Ascher-Walsh C, Tharakan T, Baxi L. Is induction of labor with continuous release dinoprostone vaginal pessary a viable option in patients with preeclampsia?. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00097-3. PMID: 10838342.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Review of Propess--a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Calder AA, MacKenzie IZ.
PMID: 15511754
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;17:S53-67.

No abstract available.

Cite
Calder AA, MacKenzie IZ. Review of Propess--a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:S53-67
Calder, A. A., & MacKenzie, I. Z. (1997). Review of Propess--a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17S53-67.
Calder, A A, and MacKenzie, I Z. "Review of Propess--a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary." Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 17 (1997): S53-67.
Calder AA, MacKenzie IZ. Review of Propess--a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;17:S53-67. PMID: 15511754.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Review of Propess- a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

A Calder And I Z Mackenzie A.
PMID: 20521973
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:S53-67. doi: 10.1080/jog.17.S2.S53.

No abstract available.

Cite
A Calder And I Z Mackenzie A. Review of Propess- a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:S53-67doi: 10.1080/jog.17.S2.S53.
A Calder And I Z Mackenzie, A. (1997). Review of Propess- a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17S53-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/jog.17.S2.S53
A Calder And I Z Mackenzie, A. "Review of Propess- a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary." Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology vol. 17 (1997): S53-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/jog.17.S2.S53
A Calder And I Z Mackenzie A. Review of Propess- a controlled release dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2 ) pessary. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;17:S53-67. doi: 10.1080/jog.17.S2.S53. PMID: 20521973.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India

Sareen S, Chawla I, Singh P.
PMID: 25136173
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):270-3. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0521-8. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety profile of two methods of labor induction i.e., intracervical dinoprostone gel (0.5 mg 8 h) and misoprostol (50 μg 4 h) for induction of labor in women with a poor Bishop's score.DESIGN:...

Cite
Sareen S, Chawla I, Singh P. Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):270-3doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0521-8.
Sareen, S., Chawla, I., & Singh, P. (2014). Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 64(4), 270-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0521-8
Sareen, Sweta, et al. "Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?." Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India vol. 64,4 (2014): 270-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0521-8
Sareen S, Chawla I, Singh P. Labor Induction with 50 μg Vaginal Misoprostol: Can We Reduce Induction-Delivery Intervals Safely?. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):270-3. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0521-8. Epub 2014 Apr 12. PMID: 25136173; PMCID: PMC4126944.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians

Ben Zvi D, Gutzeit O, Iluz R, Weissman A, Solt I, Weiner Z, Zipori Y.
PMID: 34278924
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jul 18;1-5. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal method for cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements at term. We hypothesized that women who undergo induction of labor for decreased fetal movements represent a higher risk group, and will benefit...

Cite
Ben Zvi D, Gutzeit O, Iluz R, et al. Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;1-5doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448.
Ben Zvi, D., Gutzeit, O., Iluz, R., Weissman, A., Solt, I., Weiner, Z., & Zipori, Y. (2021). Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448
Ben Zvi, Dikla, et al. "Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements." The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians vol. (2021): 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448
Ben Zvi D, Gutzeit O, Iluz R, Weissman A, Solt I, Weiner Z, Zipori Y. Optimizing cervical ripening in women presenting with decreased fetal movements. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jul 18;1-5. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1949448. Epub 2021 Jul 18. PMID: 34278924.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Pregnancy-related comorbidities and labor induction - the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone compared to misoprostol.

Ginekologia polska

Gornisiewicz T, Huras H, Kusmierska-Urban K, Galas A.
PMID: 34105752
Ginekol Pol. 2021 Jun 09; doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0092. Epub 2021 Jun 09.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the presence of the disease in pregnancy influences the effectiveness and safety of delivery preinduction with prostaglandins: misoprostol vaginal insert and dinoprostone vaginal gel.MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is aretrospective...

Cite
Gornisiewicz T, Huras H, Kusmierska-Urban K, et al. Pregnancy-related comorbidities and labor induction - the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone compared to misoprostol. Ginekol Pol. 2021;doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0092.
Gornisiewicz, T., Huras, H., Kusmierska-Urban, K., & Galas, A. (2021). Pregnancy-related comorbidities and labor induction - the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone compared to misoprostol. Ginekologia polska, . https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0092
Gornisiewicz, Teresa, et al. "Pregnancy-related comorbidities and labor induction - the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone compared to misoprostol." Ginekologia polska vol. (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0092
Gornisiewicz T, Huras H, Kusmierska-Urban K, Galas A. Pregnancy-related comorbidities and labor induction - the effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone compared to misoprostol. Ginekol Pol. 2021 Jun 09; doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0092. Epub 2021 Jun 09. PMID: 34105752.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction.

Ceska gynekologie

Hostinská Eliška, Šinská Alexandra, Ľubušký Marek, Pilka Radovan.
PMID: 35038873
Ceska Gynekol. 2021;86(6):368-373. doi: 10.48095/cccg2021368.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction.METHODS: The study group included a total of 437 women who underwent consecutive induction of labor after evaluation of the indication and Bishops score. The most common indications were: postmaturity,...

Cite
Hostinská Eliška, Šinská Alexandra, Ľubušký Marek, et al. Srovnání využití dinoprostonu, misoprostolu a amniotomie při indukci vaginálního porodu. Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction. Ceska Gynekol. 2021;86(6):368-373doi: 10.48095/cccg2021368.
Hostinská, E. l. i. �. �. k. a., Šinská, A. l. e. x. a. n. d. r. a., Ľubušký, M. a. r. e. k., & Pilka, R. a. d. o. v. a. n. (2021). Srovnání využití dinoprostonu, misoprostolu a amniotomie při indukci vaginálního porodu. Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction. Ceska gynekologie, 86(6), 368-373. https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2021368
Hostinská, Eliška, et al. "Srovnání využití dinoprostonu, misoprostolu a amniotomie při indukci vaginálního porodu." Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction. Ceska gynekologie vol. 86,6 (2021): 368-373. doi: https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2021368
Hostinská Eliška, Šinská Alexandra, Ľubušký Marek, Pilka Radovan. Srovnání využití dinoprostonu, misoprostolu a amniotomie při indukci vaginálního porodu. Comparison of dinoprostone, misoprostol and amniotomy in labor induction. Ceska Gynekol. 2021;86(6):368-373. doi: 10.48095/cccg2021368. PMID: 35038873.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The Influence of Diabetes on Labor Induction with Dinoprostone Vaginal Inserts.

American journal of perinatology

Duffy JY, Chau C, Raymond K, Rugarn O, Wing DA.
PMID: 34856610
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Dec 02; doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740178. Epub 2021 Dec 02.

OBJECTIVE:  The aim of this study was to compare duration of labor induction between diabetic and nondiabetic women receiving dinoprostone vaginal insert (10 mg).STUDY DESIGN:  This is a secondary analysis of two large randomized controlled trials using dinoprostone vaginal...

Cite
Duffy JY, Chau C, Raymond K, et al. The Influence of Diabetes on Labor Induction with Dinoprostone Vaginal Inserts. Am J Perinatol. 2021;doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740178.
Duffy, J. Y., Chau, C., Raymond, K., Rugarn, O., & Wing, D. A. (2021). The Influence of Diabetes on Labor Induction with Dinoprostone Vaginal Inserts. American journal of perinatology, . https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740178
Duffy, Jennifer Y, et al. "The Influence of Diabetes on Labor Induction with Dinoprostone Vaginal Inserts." American journal of perinatology vol. (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740178
Duffy JY, Chau C, Raymond K, Rugarn O, Wing DA. The Influence of Diabetes on Labor Induction with Dinoprostone Vaginal Inserts. Am J Perinatol. 2021 Dec 02; doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740178. Epub 2021 Dec 02. PMID: 34856610.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term].

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie

Bagory H, De Broucker C, Tourneux P, Balcaen T, Gondry J, Foulon A, Sergent F.
PMID: 34871786
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Dec 03; doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 03.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg compared to vaginal dinoprostone in the induction of labor at term.METHODS: Analytic, retrospective study of patients induced at term by prostaglandins with an unfavorable cervix, over two consecutive...

Cite
Bagory H, De Broucker C, Tourneux P, et al. Efficacité et tolérance du misoprostol oral 25μg vs dinoprostone vaginale dans le déclenchement du travail à terme. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021;doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.11.011.
Bagory, H., De Broucker, C., Tourneux, P., Balcaen, T., Gondry, J., Foulon, A., & Sergent, F. (2021). Efficacité et tolérance du misoprostol oral 25μg vs dinoprostone vaginale dans le déclenchement du travail à terme. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie, . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.11.011
Bagory, H, et al. "Efficacité et tolérance du misoprostol oral 25μg vs dinoprostone vaginale dans le déclenchement du travail à terme." [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie vol. (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.11.011
Bagory H, De Broucker C, Tourneux P, Balcaen T, Gondry J, Foulon A, Sergent F. Efficacité et tolérance du misoprostol oral 25μg vs dinoprostone vaginale dans le déclenchement du travail à terme. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Dec 03; doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 03. French. PMID: 34871786.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term.

Primary care update for Ob/Gyns

Sadaty A, Pagano M, Greer C, Sison C, Schaffir J.
PMID: 10838343
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00098-5.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil) can ripen the cervix and induce labor more effectively and safely than a hospital-prepared intravaginal gel.Methods: Three hundred thirty-six patients undergoing cervical ripening for induction...

Cite
Sadaty A, Pagano M, Greer C, et al. A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):183doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00098-5.
Sadaty, A., Pagano, M., Greer, C., Sison, C., & Schaffir, J. (1998). A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term. Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 5(4), 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00098-5
Sadaty, et al. "A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term." Primary care update for Ob/Gyns vol. 5,4 (1998): 183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00098-5
Sadaty A, Pagano M, Greer C, Sison C, Schaffir J. A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00098-5. PMID: 10838343.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial.

American journal of perinatology

Edwards RK, Norris ML, West MD, Zornes C, Loeffler KA, Peck JD.
PMID: 32120419
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38:e57-e63. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705113. Epub 2020 Mar 02.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of study is to compare, in a pilot study, combined dinoprostone vaginal insert and Foley catheter (DVI + Foley) with Foley alone (Foley) for cervical ripening and labor induction at term.STUDY DESIGN: In this open-label pilot...

Cite
Edwards RK, Norris ML, West MD, et al. Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2020;38:e57-e63doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705113.
Edwards, R. K., Norris, M. L., West, M. D., Zornes, C., Loeffler, K. A., & Peck, J. D. (2021). Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial. American journal of perinatology, 38e57-e63. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1705113
Edwards, Rodney K, et al. "Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial." American journal of perinatology vol. 38 (2021): e57-e63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1705113
Edwards RK, Norris ML, West MD, Zornes C, Loeffler KA, Peck JD. Controlled Release Dinoprostone Insert and Foley Compared to Foley Alone: A Randomized Pilot Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38:e57-e63. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705113. Epub 2020 Mar 02. PMID: 32120419; PMCID: PMC8049622.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 67 entries