Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.

Journal of clinical epidemiology

Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill R.
PMID: 26092286
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

OBJECTIVE: To develop ROBIS, a new tool for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews (rather than in primary studies).STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We used four-stage approach to develop ROBIS: define the scope, review the evidence base, hold...

Cite
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;69:225-34doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005.
Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., Davies, P., Kleijnen, J., Churchill, R. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 69225-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
Whiting, Penny, et al. "ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed." Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 69 (2016): 225-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, Davies P, Kleijnen J, Churchill R. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;69:225-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PMID: 26092286; PMCID: PMC4687950.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons.

International journal of clinical practice

Ortega A, Fraga MD, Alegre-del-Rey EJ, Puigventós-Latorre F, Porta A, Ventayol P, Tenias JM, Hawkins NS, Caldwell DM.
PMID: 25269948
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;68(10):1181-9. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12487.

The aim of this study was to develop a user-friendly checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons of drugs, considering clinical, methodological/statistical and quality aspects, mainly to be applied in drug evaluation in the decision-making context. After conducting a...

Cite
Ortega A, Fraga MD, Alegre-del-Rey EJ, et al. A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(10):1181-9doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12487.
Ortega, A., Fraga, M. D., Alegre-del-Rey, E. J., Puigventós-Latorre, F., Porta, A., Ventayol, P., Tenias, J. M., Hawkins, N. S., & Caldwell, D. M. (2014). A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons. International journal of clinical practice, 68(10), 1181-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12487
Ortega, A, et al. "A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons." International journal of clinical practice vol. 68,10 (2014): 1181-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12487
Ortega A, Fraga MD, Alegre-del-Rey EJ, Puigventós-Latorre F, Porta A, Ventayol P, Tenias JM, Hawkins NS, Caldwell DM. A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons. Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;68(10):1181-9. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12487. PMID: 25269948.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta-analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis.

Research synthesis methods

Caldwell DM, Welton NJ, Dias S, Ades AE.
PMID: 26062086
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):126-41. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1040. Epub 2012 Jun 04.

Dichotomous outcomes in pairwise meta-analysis are typically summarised using the odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR) or risk difference (RD). The hazard ratio (HR) may also be used where events occur over time. Choice of scale is often determined...

Cite
Caldwell DM, Welton NJ, Dias S, et al. Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta-analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):126-41doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1040.
Caldwell, D. M., Welton, N. J., Dias, S., & Ades, A. E. (2012). Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta-analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis. Research synthesis methods, 3(2), 126-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1040
Caldwell, Deborah M, et al. "Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta-analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis." Research synthesis methods vol. 3,2 (2012): 126-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1040
Caldwell DM, Welton NJ, Dias S, Ades AE. Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta-analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis. Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):126-41. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1040. Epub 2012 Jun 04. PMID: 26062086.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 entries