Cite
Vissers K, Hoffmann V, Geenen F, et al. Is the second phase of the formalin test useful to predict activity in chronic constriction injury models? A pharmacological comparison in different species. Pain Pract. 2003;3(4):298-309doi: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03033.x.
Vissers, K., Hoffmann, V., Geenen, F., Biermans, R., & Meert, T. (2003). Is the second phase of the formalin test useful to predict activity in chronic constriction injury models? A pharmacological comparison in different species. Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 3(4), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03033.x
Vissers, K, et al. "Is the second phase of the formalin test useful to predict activity in chronic constriction injury models? A pharmacological comparison in different species." Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain vol. 3,4 (2003): 298-309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03033.x
Vissers K, Hoffmann V, Geenen F, Biermans R, Meert T. Is the second phase of the formalin test useful to predict activity in chronic constriction injury models? A pharmacological comparison in different species. Pain Pract. 2003 Dec;3(4):298-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-7085.2003.03033.x. PMID: 17166125.
Copy
Download .nbib