Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Status symbol. Affluent women have cesareans more often than poor women do.

Scientific American

Horgan J.
PMID: 2781259
Sci Am. 1989 Oct;261(4):36.

No abstract available.

Cite
Horgan J. Status symbol. Affluent women have cesareans more often than poor women do. Sci Am. 1989;261(4):36
Horgan, J. (1989). Status symbol. Affluent women have cesareans more often than poor women do. Scientific American, 261(4), 36.
Horgan, J. "Status symbol. Affluent women have cesareans more often than poor women do." Scientific American vol. 261,4 (1989): 36.
Horgan J. Status symbol. Affluent women have cesareans more often than poor women do. Sci Am. 1989 Oct;261(4):36. PMID: 2781259.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Caesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala.

The National medical journal of India

Thankappan KR.
PMID: 10732435
Natl Med J India. 1999 Nov-Dec;12(6):297.

No abstract available.

Cite
Thankappan KR. Caesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala. Natl Med J India. 1999;12(6):297
Thankappan, K. R. (1999). Caesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala. The National medical journal of India, 12(6), 297.
Thankappan, K R. "Caesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala." The National medical journal of India vol. 12,6 (1999): 297.
Thankappan KR. Caesarean section deliveries on the rise in Kerala. Natl Med J India. 1999 Nov-Dec;12(6):297. PMID: 10732435.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Comment on the paper by Freitas et al].

Cadernos de saude publica

Leal Mdo C.
PMID: 26578009
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):1853-4. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO010915.

No abstract available.

Cite
Leal Mdo C. Comentário sobre o artigo de Freitas et al. [Comment on the paper by Freitas et al]. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(9):1853-4doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO010915.
Leal, M. d. o. . C. (2015). Comentário sobre o artigo de Freitas et al. [Comment on the paper by Freitas et al]. Cadernos de saude publica, 31(9), 1853-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XCO010915
Leal, Maria do Carmo. "Comentário sobre o artigo de Freitas et al." [Comment on the paper by Freitas et al]. Cadernos de saude publica vol. 31,9 (2015): 1853-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XCO010915
Leal Mdo C. Comentário sobre o artigo de Freitas et al. [Comment on the paper by Freitas et al]. Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):1853-4. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO010915. Portuguese. PMID: 26578009.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[The authors reply].

Cadernos de saude publica

Freitas PF, Moreira BC, Manoel AL, Botura AC.
PMID: 26578010
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):1854-5. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO020915.

No abstract available.

Cite
Freitas PF, Moreira BC, Manoel AL, et al. Os autores respondem. [The authors reply]. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(9):1854-5doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO020915.
Freitas, P. F., Moreira, B. C., Manoel, A. L., & Botura, A. C. (2015). Os autores respondem. [The authors reply]. Cadernos de saude publica, 31(9), 1854-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XCO020915
Freitas, Paulo Fontoura, et al. "Os autores respondem." [The authors reply]. Cadernos de saude publica vol. 31,9 (2015): 1854-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XCO020915
Freitas PF, Moreira BC, Manoel AL, Botura AC. Os autores respondem. [The authors reply]. Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):1854-5. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XCO020915. Portuguese. PMID: 26578010.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
C section rates and increased malpractice premiums--an alternate explanation.

Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Johnson WP.
PMID: 2495559
Public Health Rep. 1989 Mar-Apr;104(2):200-1.
Free PMC Article

No abstract available.

Cite
Johnson WP. C section rates and increased malpractice premiums--an alternate explanation. Public Health Rep. 1989;104(2):200-1
Johnson, W. P. (1989). C section rates and increased malpractice premiums--an alternate explanation. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 104(2), 200-1.
Johnson, W P. "C section rates and increased malpractice premiums--an alternate explanation." Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) vol. 104,2 (1989): 200-1.
Johnson WP. C section rates and increased malpractice premiums--an alternate explanation. Public Health Rep. 1989 Mar-Apr;104(2):200-1. PMID: 2495559; PMCID: PMC1580028.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990.

Statistical bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984)

[No authors listed]
PMID: 1566230
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1992 Jan-Mar;73(1):12-8.

Based on MetLife experience during 1990, close to 30 percent of all births to group policyholders' employees and dependents were by cesarean section costing, on average, $8,530. Cesarean costs in Washington, D.C. and Connecticut were the highest--each more than...

Cite
Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1992;73(1):12-8
(1992). Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990. Statistical bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984), 73(1), 12-8.
"Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990." Statistical bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984) vol. 73,1 (1992): 12-8.
Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1992 Jan-Mar;73(1):12-8. PMID: 1566230.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

PloS one

Schantz C, de Loenzien M, Goyet S, Ravit M, Dancoisne A, Dumont A.
PMID: 30840678
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 06;14(3):e0213352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213352. eCollection 2019.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section rates are increasing worldwide, and since the 2000s, several researchers have investigated women's demand for caesarean sections.QUESTION: The aim of this article was to review and summarise published studies investigating caesarean section demand and to describe...

Cite
Schantz C, de Loenzien M, Goyet S, et al. How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213352doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213352.
Schantz, C., de Loenzien, M., Goyet, S., Ravit, M., Dancoisne, A., & Dumont, A. (2019). How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review. PloS one, 14(3), e0213352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352
Schantz, Clémence, et al. "How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review." PloS one vol. 14,3 (2019): e0213352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213352
Schantz C, de Loenzien M, Goyet S, Ravit M, Dancoisne A, Dumont A. How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2019 Mar 06;14(3):e0213352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213352. eCollection 2019. PMID: 30840678; PMCID: PMC6402700.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 7 of 7 entries