Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 19 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
[SBU: magnetic resonance tomography is expensive. Cost effectiveness is still unclear].

Lakartidningen

[No authors listed]
PMID: 1461023
Lakartidningen. 1992 Nov 18;89(47):4073-5.

No abstract available.

Cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

Szczepura AK, Fletcher J, Fitz-Patrick JD.
PMID: 1547438
BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.508-a.
Free PMC Article

No abstract available.

Multi-disciplinary research can be more than parallel-disciplinary research: the case of GPs' use of magnetic resonance imaging.

Family practice

Hale JP, Cohen DR, Robling MR, Houston H, Kinnersley P, Hourihan MD.
PMID: 10439986
Fam Pract. 1999 Jun;16(3):301-4. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.3.301.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to show how in multi-disciplinary research data collected to meet the needs of one discipline can provide information of value to another.METHODS: Using the critical incident technique, 25 GPs were interviewed about recent scans requested for...

[Increase the number of MR examinations! Optimal utilization contributes to cost-effective health care].

Lakartidningen

Bergström K, Ericson K, Fagerlund M, Hindmarsh T, Holtås S.
PMID: 11370415
Lakartidningen. 2001 Apr 18;98(16):1952-3.

No abstract available.

Diagnostic scanning for suspected scaphoid fractures: an economic evaluation based on cost-minimisation models.

Injury

Saxena P, McDonald R, Gull S, Hyder N.
PMID: 12832176
Injury. 2003 Jul;34(7):503-11. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(02)00289-9.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, the costs of diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures using various protocols with various scanning techniques.DESIGN: Analysis of the cost-minimisation models. The models were prepared after an audit of the existing protocol for suspected scaphoid fractures.SETTING: Departments of...

Cash windfall for UK pioneers of MRI.

Nature

Hadlington S.
PMID: 3352725
Nature. 1988 Mar 24;332(6162):296. doi: 10.1038/332296c0.

No abstract available.

Comparison of low-field versus high-field MR imaging.

European journal of radiology

Ziedses des Plantes BG, Koster K.
PMID: 7588872
Eur J Radiol. 1995 Jul;20(2):156-8. doi: 10.1016/0720-048x(95)90031-9.

No abstract available.

The dilemma of health care quality, access, and cost and its effect on MR imaging.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI

Hendee WR.
PMID: 1790389
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991 Sep-Oct;1(5):615-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880010517.

No abstract available.

[Is magnetic imaging worth the cost?].

Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja

Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG.
PMID: 1366284
Duodecim. 1992;108(8):707-9.

No abstract available.

Selecting an MRI unit: a guide.

Australasian radiology

Silberstein M.
PMID: 1299186
Australas Radiol. 1992 Nov;36(4):300-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1992.tb03203.x.

No abstract available.

Accessible magnetic resonance imaging.

Magnetic resonance quarterly

Kaufman L, Arakawa M, Hale J, Rothschild P, Carlson J, Hake K, Kramer D, Lu W, Van Heteren J.
PMID: 2640910
Magn Reson Q. 1989 Oct;5(4):283-97.

The cost of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is driven by magnetic field strength. Misperceptions as to the impact of field strength on performance have led to systems that are more expensive than they need to be. Careful analysis of...

MRI assessment programme: a clearer picture?.

The Medical journal of Australia

Crowe BL, Hailey DM.
PMID: 2005854
Med J Aust. 1991 Apr 01;154(7):493.

No abstract available.

Showing 1 to 12 of 19 entries