Cite
Gaudio C, Pelliccia F, Evangelista A, et al. 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(2):1562-4doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.067.
Gaudio, C., Pelliccia, F., Evangelista, A., Tanzilli, G., Paravati, V., Pannarale, G., Pannitteri, G., Barillà, F., Greco, C., Franzoni, F., Speziale, G., & Pasceri, V. (2013). 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of cardiology, 168(2), 1562-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.067
Gaudio, Carlo, et al. "320-row computed tomography coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis." International journal of cardiology vol. 168,2 (2013): 1562-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.067
Gaudio C, Pelliccia F, Evangelista A, Tanzilli G, Paravati V, Pannarale G, Pannitteri G, Barillà F, Greco C, Franzoni F, Speziale G, Pasceri V. 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1562-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.067. Epub 2013 Jan 22. PMID: 23347611.
Copy
Download .nbib