Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 25 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
We made the list, but.

Nursing & health care : official publication of the National League for Nursing

Curtin L.
PMID: 1614626
Nurs Health Care. 1992 Apr;13(4):175.

No abstract available.

Cite
Curtin L. We made the list, but. Nurs Health Care. 1992;13(4):175
Curtin, L. (1992). We made the list, but. Nursing & health care : official publication of the National League for Nursing, 13(4), 175.
Curtin, L. "We made the list, but." Nursing & health care : official publication of the National League for Nursing vol. 13,4 (1992): 175.
Curtin L. We made the list, but. Nurs Health Care. 1992 Apr;13(4):175. PMID: 1614626.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Preceptorship placements can be a burden for students.

Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization

Yonge O, Hagler P, Cox C, Drefs S.
PMID: 21263278
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182061cbc.

Fourth year baccalaureate nursing students were surveyed to determine their perceptions of the preceptorship experience. Results indicated that students highly valued and enjoyed their preceptorship experiences. However, issues related to choice, finances, and role of the administration were identified....

Cite
Yonge O, Hagler P, Cox C, et al. Preceptorship placements can be a burden for students. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011;27(1):29-34doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182061cbc.
Yonge, O., Hagler, P., Cox, C., & Drefs, S. (2011). Preceptorship placements can be a burden for students. Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization, 27(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0b013e3182061cbc
Yonge, Olive, et al. "Preceptorship placements can be a burden for students." Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization vol. 27,1 (2011): 29-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0b013e3182061cbc
Yonge O, Hagler P, Cox C, Drefs S. Preceptorship placements can be a burden for students. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e3182061cbc. PMID: 21263278.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Testing: How Should the Evidence Be Used?.

Nursing education perspectives

Fitzpatrick JJ.
PMID: 26328287
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):211. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-36.4.211.

No abstract available.

Cite
Fitzpatrick JJ. Testing: How Should the Evidence Be Used?. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015;36(4):211doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-36.4.211.
Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2015). Testing: How Should the Evidence Be Used?. Nursing education perspectives, 36(4), 211. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-36.4.211
Fitzpatrick, Joyce J. "Testing: How Should the Evidence Be Used?." Nursing education perspectives vol. 36,4 (2015): 211. doi: https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-36.4.211
Fitzpatrick JJ. Testing: How Should the Evidence Be Used?. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):211. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-36.4.211. PMID: 26328287.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development.

Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD

Hamilton GA.
PMID: 8326414
J Nurs Staff Dev. 1993 May-Jun;9(3):148-54.

This article presents an overview of evaluation research methods. A clear distinction is made between evaluation research and research methods, and evaluation research and quality assurance. Examples from nursing staff development are used to illustrate selected evaluation research methods.

Cite
Hamilton GA. An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development. J Nurs Staff Dev. 1993;9(3):148-54
Hamilton, G. A. (1993). An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development. Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD, 9(3), 148-54.
Hamilton, G A. "An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development." Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD vol. 9,3 (1993): 148-54.
Hamilton GA. An overview of evaluation research methods with implications for nursing staff development. J Nurs Staff Dev. 1993 May-Jun;9(3):148-54. PMID: 8326414.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Survey methods.

Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses

Connelly LM.
PMID: 19489210
Medsurg Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):114-5, 133.

No abstract available.

Cite
Connelly LM. Survey methods. Medsurg Nurs. 2009;18(2):114-5, 133
Connelly, L. M. (2009). Survey methods. Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 18(2), 114-5, 133.
Connelly, Lynne M. "Survey methods." Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses vol. 18,2 (2009): 114-5, 133.
Connelly LM. Survey methods. Medsurg Nurs. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):114-5, 133. PMID: 19489210.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The effectiveness of nursing: a review.

Journal of clinical nursing

Thomas LH, Bond S.
PMID: 7773523
J Clin Nurs. 1995 May;4(3):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1995.tb00199.x.

This paper describes the findings of a literature review of the effectiveness of nursing. Three journals were selected in which this type of study was most likely to be published. A diversity of attempts to measure nursing effectiveness with...

Cite
Thomas LH, Bond S. The effectiveness of nursing: a review. J Clin Nurs. 1995;4(3):143-51doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1995.tb00199.x.
Thomas, L. H., & Bond, S. (1995). The effectiveness of nursing: a review. Journal of clinical nursing, 4(3), 143-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1995.tb00199.x
Thomas, L H, and Bond, S. "The effectiveness of nursing: a review." Journal of clinical nursing vol. 4,3 (1995): 143-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.1995.tb00199.x
Thomas LH, Bond S. The effectiveness of nursing: a review. J Clin Nurs. 1995 May;4(3):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1995.tb00199.x. PMID: 7773523.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Process of conducting evaluation research. 10. Selecting a research design].

Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research

Holzemer WL.
PMID: 2927013
Kango Kenkyu. 1989;22(1):52-60.

No abstract available.

Cite
Holzemer WL. [Process of conducting evaluation research. 10. Selecting a research design]. Kango Kenkyu. 1989;22(1):52-60
Holzemer, W. L. (1989). [Process of conducting evaluation research. 10. Selecting a research design]. Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research, 22(1), 52-60.
Holzemer, W L. "[Process of conducting evaluation research. 10. Selecting a research design]." Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research vol. 22,1 (1989): 52-60.
Holzemer WL. [Process of conducting evaluation research. 10. Selecting a research design]. Kango Kenkyu. 1989;22(1):52-60. Japanese. PMID: 2927013.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
[Survey and research (7). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice (5)].

Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research

Kawaguchi T.
PMID: 9305065
Kango Kenkyu. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):77-82.

No abstract available.

Cite
Kawaguchi T. [Survey and research (7). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice (5)]. Kango Kenkyu. 1997;30(1):77-82
Kawaguchi, T. (1997). [Survey and research (7). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice (5)]. Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research, 30(1), 77-82.
Kawaguchi, T. "[Survey and research (7). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice (5)]." Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research vol. 30,1 (1997): 77-82.
Kawaguchi T. [Survey and research (7). Steps in the survey research process for nursing practice (5)]. Kango Kenkyu. 1997 Jan-Feb;30(1):77-82. Japanese. PMID: 9305065.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education.

Nurse education today

Lewis MJ, Davies R, Jenkins D, Tait MI.
PMID: 11162255
Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Jan;21(1):26-37. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0494.

Although there have been numerous attempts to evaluate the learning benefits of computer-based learning (CBL) packages in nursing education, the results obtained have been equivocal. A literature search conducted for this review found 25 reports of the evaluation of...

Cite
Lewis MJ, Davies R, Jenkins D, et al. A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2001;21(1):26-37doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0494.
Lewis, M. J., Davies, R., Jenkins, D., & Tait, M. I. (2001). A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education. Nurse education today, 21(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0494
Lewis, M J, et al. "A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education." Nurse education today vol. 21,1 (2001): 26-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0494
Lewis MJ, Davies R, Jenkins D, Tait MI. A review of evaluative studies of computer-based learning in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2001 Jan;21(1):26-37. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0494. PMID: 11162255.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The effectiveness of short answers test papers in evaluating academic nursing programs: A review of the literature.

Nurse education in practice

Stunden A, Jefferies D.
PMID: 30273804
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Nov;33:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

Short answer tests (SAT) are an assessment that examines nursing students' knowledge and can be used to evaluate expectations for student educational success. The purpose of this literature review is to combine the best available evidence as to whether...

Cite
Stunden A, Jefferies D. The effectiveness of short answers test papers in evaluating academic nursing programs: A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018;33:94-101doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.004.
Stunden, A., & Jefferies, D. (2018). The effectiveness of short answers test papers in evaluating academic nursing programs: A review of the literature. Nurse education in practice, 3394-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.004
Stunden, Annette, and Jefferies, Diana. "The effectiveness of short answers test papers in evaluating academic nursing programs: A review of the literature." Nurse education in practice vol. 33 (2018): 94-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.004
Stunden A, Jefferies D. The effectiveness of short answers test papers in evaluating academic nursing programs: A review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Nov;33:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 22. PMID: 30273804.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Ban happy sheets!--Understanding and using evaluation.

Nurse education today

Lambert N.
PMID: 21676507
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jan;32(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

Evaluating learning in the complex environments of health and education can be fraught with difficulties. Teaching sessions are customarily 'qualitatively' evaluated by participants filling in simple forms which indicate how they found a course--colloquially called 'happy sheets'. These forms...

Cite
Lambert N. Ban happy sheets!--Understanding and using evaluation. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;32(1):1-4doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.020.
Lambert, N. (2012). Ban happy sheets!--Understanding and using evaluation. Nurse education today, 32(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.020
Lambert, Nicky. "Ban happy sheets!--Understanding and using evaluation." Nurse education today vol. 32,1 (2012): 1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.020
Lambert N. Ban happy sheets!--Understanding and using evaluation. Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jan;32(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.020. Epub 2011 Jun 14. PMID: 21676507.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views.

Journal of advanced nursing

Freeman T.
PMID: 17078825
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(5):491-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x.

AIM: The aim of this paper is to identify the broad epistemological debates which underpin conflicting statements on 'rigour' and 'good practice' in qualitative research; to relate divergences in statements of 'good practice' in focus group design made by...

Cite
Freeman T. 'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(5):491-7doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x.
Freeman, T. (2006). 'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views. Journal of advanced nursing, 56(5), 491-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x
Freeman, Tim. "'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views." Journal of advanced nursing vol. 56,5 (2006): 491-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x
Freeman T. 'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(5):491-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04043.x. PMID: 17078825.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 25 entries