Advanced Search
Display options
Filter resources
Text Availability
Article type
Publication date
Species
Language
Sex
Age
Showing 1 to 12 of 1502 entries
Sorted by: Best Match Show Resources per page
Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science.

PloS one

Francis G, Tanzman J, Matthews WJ.
PMID: 25474317
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e114255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114255. eCollection 2014.

This article describes a systematic analysis of the relationship between empirical data and theoretical conclusions for a set of experimental psychology articles published in the journal Science between 2005-2012. When the success rate of a set of empirical studies...

Cite
Francis G, Tanzman J, Matthews WJ. Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114255doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114255.
Francis, G., Tanzman, J., & Matthews, W. J. (2014). Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science. PloS one, 9(12), e114255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114255
Francis, Gregory, et al. "Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science." PloS one vol. 9,12 (2014): e114255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114255
Francis G, Tanzman J, Matthews WJ. Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e114255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114255. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25474317; PMCID: PMC4256411.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Peer review: Get involved.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery

Dupps WJ.
PMID: 28917429
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Aug;43(8):997-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.002.

No abstract available.

Cite
Dupps WJ. Peer review: Get involved. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(8):997-998doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.002.
Dupps, W. J. (2017). Peer review: Get involved. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 43(8), 997-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.002
Dupps, William J. "Peer review: Get involved." Journal of cataract and refractive surgery vol. 43,8 (2017): 997-998. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.002
Dupps WJ. Peer review: Get involved. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Aug;43(8):997-998. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.002. PMID: 28917429.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review.

Journal of psychosomatic research

Levis AW, Leentjens AF, Levenson JL, Lumley MA, Thombs BD.
PMID: 26337110
J Psychosom Res. 2015 Dec;79(6):561-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

OBJECTIVE: Some peer reviewers may inappropriately, or coercively request that authors include references to the reviewers' own work. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether, compared to reviews for a journal with single-blind peer review, reviews for...

Cite
Levis AW, Leentjens AF, Levenson JL, et al. Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review. J Psychosom Res. 2015;79(6):561-5doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004.
Levis, A. W., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., Lumley, M. A., & Thombs, B. D. (2015). Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review. Journal of psychosomatic research, 79(6), 561-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004
Levis, Alexander W, et al. "Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review." Journal of psychosomatic research vol. 79,6 (2015): 561-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004
Levis AW, Leentjens AF, Levenson JL, Lumley MA, Thombs BD. Comparison of self-citation by peer reviewers in a journal with single-blind peer review versus a journal with open peer review. J Psychosom Res. 2015 Dec;79(6):561-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 22. PMID: 26337110.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
When postpublication peer review stings.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne

Collier R.
PMID: 25024296
CMAJ. 2014 Sep 02;186(12):904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4817. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

No abstract available.

Cite
Collier R. When postpublication peer review stings. CMAJ. 2014;186(12):904doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4817.
Collier, R. (2014). When postpublication peer review stings. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 186(12), 904. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4817
Collier, Roger. "When postpublication peer review stings." CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne vol. 186,12 (2014): 904. doi: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4817
Collier R. When postpublication peer review stings. CMAJ. 2014 Sep 02;186(12):904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4817. Epub 2014 Jul 14. PMID: 25024296; PMCID: PMC4150703.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science.

Lancet (London, England)

Shuttleworth S, Frampton S.
PMID: 26122151
Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61150-3.

No abstract available.

Cite
Shuttleworth S, Frampton S. Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science. Lancet. 2015;385(9987):2568doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61150-3.
Shuttleworth, S., & Frampton, S. (2015). Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science. Lancet (London, England), 385(9987), 2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61150-3
Shuttleworth, Sally, and Frampton, Sally. "Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science." Lancet (London, England) vol. 385,9987 (2015): 2568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61150-3
Shuttleworth S, Frampton S. Constructing Scientific Communities: Citizen Science. Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61150-3. PMID: 26122151.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!.

Clinical biochemistry

Diamandis EP.
PMID: 28238811
Clin Biochem. 2017 Jun;50(9):461-463. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

No abstract available.

Cite
Diamandis EP. The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(9):461-463doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019.
Diamandis, E. P. (2017). The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!. Clinical biochemistry, 50(9), 461-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019
Diamandis, Eleftherios P. "The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!." Clinical biochemistry vol. 50,9 (2017): 461-463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019
Diamandis EP. The current peer review system is unsustainable-awaken the paid reviewer force!. Clin Biochem. 2017 Jun;50(9):461-463. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.02.019. Epub 2017 Feb 27. PMID: 28238811.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
New member in the Executive Editorial Team.

Pathology, research and practice

[No authors listed]
PMID: 25613818
Pathol Res Pract. 2015 Jan;211(1):1. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.12.006.

No abstract available.

Cite
New member in the Executive Editorial Team. Pathol Res Pract. 2015;211(1):1doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.12.006.
(2015). New member in the Executive Editorial Team. Pathology, research and practice, 211(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.12.006
"New member in the Executive Editorial Team." Pathology, research and practice vol. 211,1 (2015): 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.12.006
New member in the Executive Editorial Team. Pathol Res Pract. 2015 Jan;211(1):1. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.12.006. PMID: 25613818.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Predatory publishing: what nurse executives need to know.

The Journal of nursing administration

Hill KS.
PMID: 25621744
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Feb;45(2):59-60. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000157.

Editors attending the 2014 meeting of the International Academy of Nursing Editors have coalesced to provide information to our readers regarding a recent trend in the publishing world, predatory publishing.

Cite
Hill KS. Predatory publishing: what nurse executives need to know. J Nurs Adm. 2015;45(2):59-60doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000157.
Hill, K. S. (2015). Predatory publishing: what nurse executives need to know. The Journal of nursing administration, 45(2), 59-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000157
Hill, Karen S. "Predatory publishing: what nurse executives need to know." The Journal of nursing administration vol. 45,2 (2015): 59-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000157
Hill KS. Predatory publishing: what nurse executives need to know. J Nurs Adm. 2015 Feb;45(2):59-60. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000157. PMID: 25621744.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Acknowledging the work of manuscript reviewers.

Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners

Martin SA.
PMID: 25908319
J Pediatr Health Care. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):217-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.02.003.

No abstract available.

Cite
Martin SA. Acknowledging the work of manuscript reviewers. J Pediatr Health Care. 2015;29(3):217-8doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.02.003.
Martin, S. A. (2015). Acknowledging the work of manuscript reviewers. Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners, 29(3), 217-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.02.003
Martin, Sarah A. "Acknowledging the work of manuscript reviewers." Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners vol. 29,3 (2015): 217-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.02.003
Martin SA. Acknowledging the work of manuscript reviewers. J Pediatr Health Care. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):217-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.02.003. PMID: 25908319.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
A comment on the AAM track.

mBio

Cassone A.
PMID: 26443459
mBio. 2015 Oct 06;6(5):e01455-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01455-15.

No abstract available.

Cite
Cassone A. A comment on the AAM track. mBio. 2015;6(5):e01455-15doi: 10.1128/mBio.01455-15.
Cassone, A. (2015). A comment on the AAM track. mBio, 6(5), e01455-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01455-15
Cassone, Antonio. "A comment on the AAM track." mBio vol. 6,5 (2015): e01455-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01455-15
Cassone A. A comment on the AAM track. mBio. 2015 Oct 06;6(5):e01455-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01455-15. PMID: 26443459; PMCID: PMC4611046.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology

Berquist TH.
PMID: 28639928
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul;209(1):1-2. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18430.

No abstract available.

Cite
Berquist TH. Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):1-2doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18430.
Berquist, T. H. (2017). Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 209(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18430
Berquist, Thomas H. "Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?." AJR. American journal of roentgenology vol. 209,1 (2017): 1-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18430
Berquist TH. Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jul;209(1):1-2. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18430. PMID: 28639928.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Editor's Comments.

Community mental health journal

[No authors listed]
PMID: 29071655
Community Ment Health J. 2017 Nov;53(8):1005-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0173-0.

No abstract available.

Cite
Editor's Comments. Community Ment Health J. 2017;53(8):1005-1006doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0173-0.
(2017). Editor's Comments. Community mental health journal, 53(8), 1005-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0173-0
"Editor's Comments." Community mental health journal vol. 53,8 (2017): 1005-1006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0173-0
Editor's Comments. Community Ment Health J. 2017 Nov;53(8):1005-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0173-0. PMID: 29071655.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Showing 1 to 12 of 1502 entries