Display options
Share it on
Full text links
PubMed Central Free PMC Article

Plant Physiol. 1999 Jun;120(2):571-8. doi: 10.1104/pp.120.2.571.

Aldehyde oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase in a flacca tomato mutant with deficient abscisic acid and wilty phenotype .

Plant physiology

Fluhr, Lips, Sagi

Affiliations

  1. Biostress Research Laboratory, Department of Life Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer 84990, Israel (M.S., S.H.L.).

PMID: 10364409 PMCID: PMC59296 DOI: 10.1104/pp.120.2.571
Free PMC Article

Abstract

The flacca tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) mutant displays a wilty phenotype as a result of abscisic acid (ABA) deficiency. The Mo cofactor (MoCo)-containing aldehyde oxidases (AO; EC 1.2.3.1) are thought to play a role in the final oxidation step required for ABA biosynthesis. AO and related MoCo-containing enzymes xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH; EC 1.2.1.37) and nitrate reductase (EC 1.6.6.1) were examined in extracts of the flacca tomato genotype and of wild-type (WT) roots and shoots. The levels of MoCo were found to be similar in both genotypes. No significant XDH or AO (MoCo-containing hydroxylases) activities were detected in flacca leaves; however, the mutant exhibited considerable MoCo-containing hydroxylase activity in the roots, which contained notable amounts of ABA. Native western blots probed with an antibody to MoCo-containing hydroxylases revealed substantial, albeit reduced, levels of cross-reactive protein in the flacca mutant shoots and roots. The ABA xylem-loading rate was significantly lower than that in the WT, indicating that the flacca is also defective in ABA transport to the shoot. Significantly, in vitro sulfurylation with Na2S reactivated preexisting XDH and AO proteins in extracts from flacca, particularly from the shoots, and superinduced the basal-level activity in the WT extracts. The results indicate that in flacca, MoCo-sulfurylase activity is impaired in a tissue-dependent manner.

Cited by

References

  1. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 17;270(11):6100-7 - PubMed
  2. J Biol Chem. 1982 Apr 10;257(7):3958-62 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 - PubMed
  4. Plant Physiol. 1996 Mar;110(3):781-789 - PubMed
  5. J Biol Chem. 1992 May 25;267(15):10199-202 - PubMed
  6. Science. 1970 Aug 7;169(3945):592-3 - PubMed
  7. Plant Physiol. 1978 Oct;62(4):550-3 - PubMed
  8. Plant Physiol. 1991 Oct;97(2):670-6 - PubMed
  9. Plant Physiol. 1989 Jun;90(2):728-33 - PubMed
  10. Gene. 1993 Nov 15;133(2):279-84 - PubMed
  11. Plant Physiol. 1993 Aug;102(4):1319-1324 - PubMed
  12. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1982 Nov;219(1):39-46 - PubMed
  13. Plant Physiol. 1978 Jan;61(1):107-10 - PubMed
  14. Plant Physiol. 1966 Oct;41(8):1387-91 - PubMed
  15. Genetics. 1967 Sep;57(1):25-39 - PubMed
  16. Plant Physiol. 1983 May;72(1):251-5 - PubMed
  17. J Biol Chem. 1982 Feb 10;257(3):1354-9 - PubMed
  18. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 10;272(2):1019-25 - PubMed
  19. J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 13;272(24):15280-5 - PubMed
  20. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  21. J Biol Chem. 1967 Sep 25;242(18):4097-107 - PubMed
  22. Plant Physiol. 1997 May;114(1):161-6 - PubMed
  23. Plant Physiol. 1995 Apr;107(4):1427-1431 - PubMed
  24. Planta. 1988 Mar;173(3):397-404 - PubMed

Publication Types

LinkOut - more resources