Display options
Cite
Rayburn W, Lucas M, Gittens L, et al. Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E(2) gel with expectant management. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998;5(4):182-183doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1.
Rayburn, W., Lucas, M., Gittens, L., Goodwin, T. M., Baxi, L., Gall, S., Mostello, D., & Heyl, P. (1998). Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E(2) gel with expectant management. Primary care update for Ob/Gyns, 5(4), 182-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1
Rayburn, et al. "Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E(2) gel with expectant management." Primary care update for Ob/Gyns vol. 5,4 (1998): 182-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1
Rayburn W, Lucas M, Gittens L, Goodwin TM, Baxi L, Gall S, Mostello D, Heyl P. Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E(2) gel with expectant management. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):182-183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1. PMID: 10838341.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 1998 Jul 01;5(4):182-183. doi: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1.

Attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section: a multicenter comparison of outpatient prostaglandin E(2) gel with expectant management.

Primary care update for Ob/Gyns

Rayburn, Lucas, Gittens, Goodwin, Baxi, Gall, Mostello, Heyl

Affiliations

  1. Pharmacia-Upjohn, Michigan, Kalamazoo, USA

PMID: 10838341 DOI: 10.1016/s1068-607x(98)00096-1

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of outpatient administration of an intracervical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) gel with expectant management for women with an unfavorable cervix who wish to attempt a vaginal birth after cesarean section.Study Design: This outpatient study was a randomized, multicenter investigation involving pregnant women at term with one previous low transverse cesarean section. Each had an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score

Publication Types