Cite
Brush JE, Thompson S, Ciuffo AA, et al. Retrospective Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical Backup. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996;8(2):91-98
Brush, J. E., Thompson, S., Ciuffo, A. A., Parker, J., Stine, R. A., Mansfield, C. L., & Hagerman, P. (1996). Retrospective Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical Backup. The Journal of invasive cardiology, 8(2), 91-98.
Brush, et al. "Retrospective Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical Backup." The Journal of invasive cardiology vol. 8,2 (1996): 91-98.
Brush JE, Thompson S, Ciuffo AA, Parker J, Stine RA, Mansfield CL, Hagerman P. Retrospective Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty versus Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical Backup. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996 Mar;8(2):91-98. PMID: 10785683.
Copy
Download .nbib