Urol Oncol. 2000 Sep 01;5(5):224-231. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(00)00069-7.

Urinary diversion and bladder substitution in patients with bladder cancer.

Urologic oncology

Davidsson, Wullt, Könyves, Månsson, Månsson

PMID: 10973712 DOI: 10.1016/s1078-1439(00)00069-7

Abstract

For the majority of patients with invasive bladder carcinoma, radical cystectomy remains the gold standard of care. As a result the twentieth century has seen the continuous development of methods for reconstructing the urinary tract. Two decades ago the ileal conduit was by far the most commonly used method, whereas today methods geared toward patient continence are first choices in most centers. Some of these methods are unquestionably more complex than the ileal conduit, yet whether they actually yield uniformly improved quality of life is the cause of much debate. Many different variables play a role in determining the best type of reconstruction for an individual bladder cancer patient. This review analyzes the different factors that must be considered to obtain an optimal match between patient and reconstructive method.

Publication Types

• Journal Article