Display options
Cite
Eve E, Arguelles FA, Fearnside PM. How Well Does Brazil's Environmental Law Work in Practice? Environmental Impact Assessment and the Case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan. Environ Manage. 2000;26(3):251-267doi: 10.1007/s002670010085.
Eve, E., Arguelles, F. A., & Fearnside, P. M. (2000). How Well Does Brazil's Environmental Law Work in Practice? Environmental Impact Assessment and the Case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan. Environmental management, 26(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010085
Eve, et al. "How Well Does Brazil's Environmental Law Work in Practice? Environmental Impact Assessment and the Case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan." Environmental management vol. 26,3 (2000): 251-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010085
Eve E, Arguelles FA, Fearnside PM. How Well Does Brazil's Environmental Law Work in Practice? Environmental Impact Assessment and the Case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan. Environ Manage. 2000 Sep;26(3):251-267. doi: 10.1007/s002670010085. PMID: 10977880.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Environ Manage. 2000 Sep;26(3):251-267. doi: 10.1007/s002670010085.

How Well Does Brazil's Environmental Law Work in Practice? Environmental Impact Assessment and the Case of the Itapiranga Private Sustainable Logging Plan.

Environmental management

Eve, Arguelles, Fearnside

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Latin American Studies (ILAS), School of Advanced Studies (SAS), University of London, 31 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HA, United Kingdom

PMID: 10977880 DOI: 10.1007/s002670010085

Abstract

/ The Itapiranga Sustainable Logging Plan provides an example of how Brazil's licensing system functions for logging companies in the state of Amazonas. Two questions need to be dealt with: "How sustainable can logging in the Amazon be?" and "What and how effective are existing legal mechanisms to deal with logging projects?" The environmental impact assessment (EIA) and environmental impact statement (EIS, known as the RIMA in Brazil), present relatively detailed accounts of biodiversity and the need to adopt conservation strategies to protect it. However, social and health impacts are only superficially addressed. The economic sustainability of the operation over multiple cycles is not demonstrated. The multidisciplinary teams responsible for the EIA and EIS (RIMA) reports are hired by the project proponent, an arrangement inherently carrying the risk of biasing the result. Logging reduces biodiversity, releases greenhouse gases and inflicts social and health costs. These impacts reduce the ability of Amazonian forests to provide environmental services and to supply food and livelihood security to local populations. The reports inflate positive effects such as employment: the estimated number of jobs was cut by more than half in a revision made after the EIA and EIS (RIMA) had been approved. Not only do the reports need to be more realistic in assessing both positive and negative consequences of proposed projects, but better means are needed to ensure that promised mitigatory measures are enforced in practice. Many of the lessons that can be drawn from the Itapiranga Plan are not unique to logging projects and apply to licensing of development activites generally in Brazil and elsewhere.

Publication Types