Display options
Share it on

Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):543-549. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.543.

Calcium/Calmodulin Activation of Soybean Glutamate Decarboxylase.

Plant physiology

W. A. Snedden, T. Arazi, H. Fromm, B. J. Shelp

Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Science and Interdepartmental Plant Physiology Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1 (W.A.S., B.J.S.).

PMID: 12228492 PMCID: PMC157373 DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.2.543

Abstract

Recently, we provided preliminary evidence for calcium (Ca2+)/calmodulin (CaM) stimulation of plant glutamate decarboxylase (GAD; EC 4.1.1.15). In the present study, a detailed characterization of the phenomenon is described. GAD was partially purified from various soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) tissues (developing seed coat and cotyledons, leaf, and root) in the presence of EDTA by a combination of ammonium sulfate precipitation and anion-exchange fast protein liquid chromatography. GAD activity showed a sharp optimum at pH 5.8, with about 12% of maximal activity at pH 7. It was stimulated 2- to 8-fold (depending on the tissue source) in the presence of Ca2+/CaM at pH 7 but not at pH 5.8. Furthermore, when the protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was omitted from the purification procedure, GAD activity was insensitive to Ca2+/CaM but was similar in magnitude to CaM-stimulated activity. The stimulation by Ca2+/CaM was fully inhibited by the CaM antagonists N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfon-amide and trifluoperazine. With saturating CaM or Ca2+, the concentrations of Ca2+ and CaM required for half-maximal stimulation were about 7 to 11 [mu]M and 25 nM, respectively. The effect of Ca2+ and CaM appeared to be through a 2.4-fold stimulation of Vmax and a 55% reduction in Km. The results suggested that GAD is activated via Ca2+ signal transduction.

References

  1. J Biol Chem. 1987 Aug 5;262(22):10689-94 - PubMed
  2. Physiol Rev. 1991 Jan;71(1):129-53 - PubMed
  3. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):524-6 - PubMed
  4. Neurochem Res. 1991 Mar;16(3):215-26 - PubMed
  5. Plant Physiol. 1984 May;75(1):170-5 - PubMed
  6. Plant Physiol. 1992 Jun;99(2):665-71 - PubMed
  7. J Biol Chem. 1993 Sep 15;268(26):19610-7 - PubMed
  8. J Biol Chem. 1994 Mar 11;269(10):7249-54 - PubMed
  9. Plant Physiol. 1992 Feb;98(2):680-6 - PubMed
  10. Plant Physiol. 1993 Sep;103(1):7-13 - PubMed
  11. Anal Biochem. 1984 Aug 15;141(1):168-78 - PubMed
  12. Plant Physiol. 1994 Mar;104(3):865-871 - PubMed
  13. Plant Physiol. 1992 Dec;100(4):1670-81 - PubMed
  14. Plant Physiol. 1994 Dec;106(4):1381-1387 - PubMed
  15. Biochem J. 1975 Jun;147(3):479-84 - PubMed
  16. J Biol Chem. 1989 May 25;264(15):8865-72 - PubMed
  17. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1993;12(3):185-211 - PubMed
  18. Plant Physiol. 1995 Jun;108(2):551-61 - PubMed
  19. Plant Physiol. 1972 Apr;49(4):572-8 - PubMed
  20. Plant Physiol. 1994 Oct;106(2):513-520 - PubMed
  21. J Neurochem. 1965 Apr;12:287-309 - PubMed
  22. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  23. J Biol Chem. 1994 May 27;269(21):15147-53 - PubMed
  24. Plant Physiol. 1993 Oct;103(2):385-390 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Jul 1;150(1):53-60 - PubMed
  26. J Biol Chem. 1988 Dec 5;263(34):18145-51 - PubMed

Publication Types