Display options
Share it on

Plant Cell. 1996 Jun;8(6):1001-1011. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.6.1001.

Decreased Susceptibility to Viral Disease of [beta]-1,3-Glucanase-Deficient Plants Generated by Antisense Transformation.

The Plant cell

R. S. Beffa, R. M. Hofer, M. Thomas, F. Meins

Affiliations

  1. The Friedrich Miescher Institute, P.O. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.

PMID: 12239410 PMCID: PMC161154 DOI: 10.1105/tpc.8.6.1001

Abstract

Antifungal class I [beta]-1,3-glucanases are believed to be part of the constitutive and induced defenses of plants against fungal infection. Unexpectedly, mutants deficient in these enzymes generated by antisense transformation showed markedly reduced lesion size, lesion number, and virus yield in the local-lesion response of Havana 425 tobacco to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and of Nicotiana sylvestris to tobacco necrosis virus. These mutants also showed decreased severity of mosaic disease symptoms, delayed spread of symptoms, and reduced yield of virus in the susceptible response of N. sylvestris to TMV. The symptoms of disease in the responses of both plant species were positively correlated with [beta]-1,3-glucanase content in a series of independent transformants. Taken together, these results provide direct evidence that [beta]-1,3-glucanases function in viral pathogenesis. Callose, a substrate for [beta]-1,3-glucanase, acts as a physical barrier to the spread of virus. Callose deposition in and surrounding TMV-induced lesions was increased in the [beta]-1,3-glucanase-deficient, local-lesion Havana 425 host, suggesting as a working hypothesis that decreased susceptibility to virus resulted from increased deposition of callose in response to infection. Our results suggest novel means, based on antisense transformation with host genes, for protecting plants against viral infection. These observations also raise the intriguing possibility that viruses can use a defense response of the host against fungal infection[mdash]production of [beta]-1,3-glucanases[mdash]to promote their own replication and spread.

References

  1. Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jul;17(1):171-3 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8792-6 - PubMed
  3. Plant Mol Biol. 1994 May;25(2):299-311 - PubMed
  4. Plant Cell. 1992 Aug;4(8):915-28 - PubMed
  5. EMBO J. 1987 Nov;6(11):3209-12 - PubMed
  6. Plant Physiol. 1988 Nov;88(3):936-42 - PubMed
  7. Plant Physiol. 1995 Oct;109(2):603-10 - PubMed
  8. Plant Mol Biol. 1990 Dec;15(6):797-808 - PubMed
  9. Virology. 1972 Dec;50(3):791-8 - PubMed
  10. Virology. 1970 Apr;40(4):820-7 - PubMed
  11. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1985;2:89-103 - PubMed
  12. Plant Cell. 1991 Oct;3(10):1085-1094 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5541-5 - PubMed
  14. Virology. 1975 Apr;64(2):295-307 - PubMed
  15. Plant Cell. 1989 Apr;1(4):447-457 - PubMed
  16. Plant Cell. 1992 Jul;4(7):759-71 - PubMed
  17. EMBO J. 1990 Nov;9(11):3429-36 - PubMed
  18. Virology. 1977 Jan;76(1):12-8 - PubMed

Publication Types