Display options
Cite
Kita H, Kawasaki F. Two excitatory motoneurons differ in quantal content of their junctional potentials in abdominal muscle fibers of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol. 1997;43(2):167-177doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x.
Kita, H., & Kawasaki, F. (1997). Two excitatory motoneurons differ in quantal content of their junctional potentials in abdominal muscle fibers of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Journal of insect physiology, 43(2), 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x
Kita, H, and Kawasaki, F. "Two excitatory motoneurons differ in quantal content of their junctional potentials in abdominal muscle fibers of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus." Journal of insect physiology vol. 43,2 (1997): 167-177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x
Kita H, Kawasaki F. Two excitatory motoneurons differ in quantal content of their junctional potentials in abdominal muscle fibers of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. J Insect Physiol. 1997 Feb 21;43(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x. PMID: 12769920.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Insect Physiol. 1997 Feb 21;43(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x.

Two excitatory motoneurons differ in quantal content of their junctional potentials in abdominal muscle fibers of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Journal of insect physiology

H Kita, F Kawasaki

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan

PMID: 12769920 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(96)00087-x

Abstract

In abdominal muscles 202 and 203 of the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, large and small excitatory junctional potentials (l- and s-EJPs) with similar durations can be recorded from the same muscle fibers. At the normal extracellular calcium ion concentration ([Ca(2+)](o)) of 5mM, the amplitudes of l-EJPs in both muscles were larger than the threshold membrane potential for muscle action potentials, which is about -40mV. Below 0.75mM [Ca(2+)](o), the amplitudes became much smaller and were below the firing level for the action potentials. At 0.5mM, they fluctuated and decreased to 10.3 and 1.9mV in muscles 202 and 203, respectively, and at 0.25mM frequent failures occurred. The amplitudes of s-EJPs at 5mM [Ca(2+)](o) were 13.3 and 5.1mV in muscles 202 and 203, respectively, and the fluctuating amplitudes were far below the threshold for muscle action potentials. Below 0.75mM, s-EJPs were rarely observed. The relation between log(EJP amplitude) and log([Ca(2+)](o)) was linear within a certain range of [Ca(2+)](o) and the slopes of the lines for l-EJPs were about twice as steep as those for s-EJPs in both muscles. In muscle 202, the amplitude distribution of l-EJPs obtained at 0.25mM and that of s-EJPs at 0.75mM both showed peaks at once and twice the voltage at the first peak, which were coincident with the voltages at the peaks of amplitude distributions of miniature EJPs recorded simultaneously. The reversal potentials for l- and s-EJPs in muscle 202 were +1.02 and +0.22mV, respectively. In muscle 202, the decreases in amplitude of both EJPs by L-glutamate were similar and concentration-dependent. The results suggest that the difference in amplitude between l- and s-EJPs is attributable mainly to the difference in quantal contents.

Publication Types