Display options
Cite
Jean F, Tanneau Y, Le Blanc-Louvry I, et al. Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy - efficacy on pelvic pressure. Colorectal Dis. 2002;4(5):321-325doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x.
Jean, F., Tanneau, Y., Le Blanc-Louvry, I., Leroi, A. M., Denis, P., & Michot, F. (2002). Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy - efficacy on pelvic pressure. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 4(5), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x
Jean, F., et al. "Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy - efficacy on pelvic pressure." Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland vol. 4,5 (2002): 321-325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x
Jean F, Tanneau Y, Le Blanc-Louvry I, Leroi AM, Denis P, Michot F. Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy - efficacy on pelvic pressure. Colorectal Dis. 2002 Sep;4(5):321-325. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x. PMID: 12780575.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Colorectal Dis. 2002 Sep;4(5):321-325. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x.

Treatment of enterocele by abdominal colporectosacropexy - efficacy on pelvic pressure.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

F. Jean, Y. Tanneau, I. Le Blanc-Louvry, A. M. Leroi, P. Denis, F. Michot

Affiliations

  1. Digestive Tract Research Group, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.

PMID: 12780575 DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00375.x

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Enterocele induces pelvic pressure, obstructed defaecation, lower abdominal pain and/or false urge to defaecate in patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominal colporectosacropexy in these symptoms, especially on pelvic pressure. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive women with enterocele were included. All patients were symptomatic because they had: pelvic pressure (n = 62), obstructed defaecation (n = 40), lower abdominal pain (n = 8) or faecal incontinence (n = 16). Defaecography confirmed enterocele in all patients. The surgical procedure was performed by the same surgeon and was an abdominal colporectosacropexy with a nonabsorbable Prolene(R) mesh. After surgery, clinical evaluation (62/62 patients) and a telephone questionnaire (56/62 patients) were performed, respectively, 3 months and 27 +/- 13 months after surgery. RESULTS: Defaecography showed rectal abnormalities associated with enterocele in 59/62 patients (rectocele, rectal prolapse). No recurrence of enterocele was observed 3 months after surgery, but 1 patient demonstrated recurrence 10 months after surgery. Pelvic pressure was less frequent after abdominal colporectosacropexy, than before surgery (P < 0.01): pelvic pressure totally disappeared in 41/56 patients, and partially in 10/56 patients. The number of patients with obstructed defaecation, lower abdominal pain, or faecal incontinence was not different before and 27 months after surgery. The number of patients with urinary incontinence was also not different before and after surgery (30 and 27 patients). CONCLUSIONS: This study of a large number of patients with enterocele shows that abdominal colporectosacropexy improves pelvic pressure in most patients and does not modify urinary status.

Publication Types