Display options
Share it on

Forensic Sci Int. 2004 Feb 10;140(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.017.

Chemical fingerprinting of gasoline. Part 3. Comparison of unevaporated automotive gasoline samples from Australia and New Zealand.

Forensic science international

P M L Sandercock, E Du Pasquier

Affiliations

  1. Forensic Laboratory Service, Royal Canadian Mounted Police 15707-118th Avenue, Edmonton, AB T5V 1B7, Canada. [email protected]

PMID: 15013167 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.017

Abstract

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring (GC-MS (SIM)) method was used to discriminate samples of unevaporated gasoline collected from Auckland, New Zealand and Sydney, Australia. This method was applied to 28 samples of unevaporated gasoline, covering three different grades (regular unleaded, premium unleaded and premium plus unleaded), that were collected from service stations in Auckland, New Zealand in summer (February) and winter (August). The 14 samples of summer gasoline collected in New Zealand could be divided into seven unique groups. The 14 samples of winter gasoline from New Zealand could be divided into 14 unique groups. The 14 samples collected in New Zealand during February 2002 were then compared to 24 samples of unevaporated gasoline collected from service stations in Sydney, Australia during the same month. Most of the samples could be differentiated based on their country of origin.

Publication Types