Display options
Share it on

J Chromatogr A. 2004 Apr 16;1033(2):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.01.053.

Comparison of the chromatographic behavior of monolithic capillary columns in capillary electrochromatography and nano-high-performance liquid chromatography.

Journal of chromatography. A

Ruth Freitag

Affiliations

  1. Center of Biotechnology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. [email protected]

PMID: 15088747 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.01.053

Abstract

Porous monoliths based on N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMAA) or methacrylamide (MAA) were prepared inside fused silica capillaries as stationary phases for nano-chromatography. The columns were characterized in terms of flow rate and backpressure and showed, e.g. differences as a function of the salt concentration added to the polymerization mixture. When the columns were investigated for the separation of uncharged (polar hydroxylated aromatic compounds) and charged (amino acids) analytes under pressure driven conditions (pLC), differences to the previously observed behavior under voltage driven conditions (CEC) were observed. Whereas the non-charged analytes showed similar behavior in both cases--thus, corroborating the previous assumption of a mainly chromatographic separation mode driven by hydrophilic interactions in CEC--the charged amino acids did not. Assuming that the separation was governed by chromatographic phenomena in the pLC mode and by both chromatographic and electrophoretic effects in the CEC mode, the experiments allowed deconvoluting the two contributions. In particular, the charged amino acids appeared to interact with the stationary phases mainly by electrostatic interactions modified by some hydrophilic effects.

MeSH terms

Publication Types