Display options
Share it on

Filaria J. 2004 Sep 03;3(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1475-2883-3-9.

Recombinant antigen-based antibody assays for the diagnosis and surveillance of lymphatic filariasis - a multicenter trial.

Filaria journal

Patrick J Lammie, Gary Weil, Rahmah Noordin, Perumal Kaliraj, Cathy Steel, David Goodman, Vijaya B Lakshmikanthan, Eric Ottesen

Affiliations

  1. Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS-F13, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, Georgia, 30341, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 15347425 PMCID: PMC519021 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2883-3-9

Abstract

The development of antifilarial antibody responses is a characteristic feature of infection with filarial parasites. It should be possible to exploit this fact to develop tools to monitor the progress of the global program to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF); however, assays based on parasite extracts suffer from a number of limitations, including the paucity of parasite material, the difficulty of assay standardization and problems with assay specificity. In principle, assays based on recombinant filarial antigens should address these limitations and provide useful tools for diagnosis and surveillance of LF. The present multicenter study was designed to compare the performance of antibody assays for filariasis based on recombinant antigens Bm14, WbSXP, and BmR1. Coded serum specimens were distributed to five participating laboratories where assays for each antigen were conducted in parallel. Assays based on Bm14, WbSXP, or BmR1 demonstrated good sensitivity (>90%) for field use and none of the assays demonstrated reactivity with specimens from persons with non-filarial helminth infections. Limitations of the assays are discussed. Well-designed field studies are now needed to assess sampling methodology and the application of antibody testing to the monitoring and surveillance of LF elimination programs.

References

  1. Acta Trop. 2004 May;90(3):255-61 - PubMed
  2. J Infect Dis. 1987 Aug;156(2):350-5 - PubMed
  3. Filaria J. 2004 Dec 31;3(1):10 - PubMed
  4. Filaria J. 2004 May 5;3(1):3 - PubMed
  5. Trop Med Int Health. 1999 Feb;4(2):98-104 - PubMed
  6. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 Dec;56(2):269-77 - PubMed
  7. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Jul;61(1):53-8 - PubMed
  8. Parasitology. 1998 Feb;116 ( Pt 2):173-82 - PubMed
  9. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998 Aug;59(2):217-21 - PubMed
  10. Trop Med Int Health. 2001 Aug;6(8):582-606 - PubMed
  11. Trends Parasitol. 2002 Mar;18(3):109-15 - PubMed
  12. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000 Mar 15;107(1):71-80 - PubMed
  13. Parasitology. 1993 May;106 ( Pt 4):413-20 - PubMed
  14. J Infect Dis. 2000 Dec;182(6):1796-9 - PubMed
  15. Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Oct;8(10 ):895-900 - PubMed
  16. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1994 Apr;64(2):261-71 - PubMed
  17. Trop Med Parasitol. 1990 Dec;41(4):403-6 - PubMed
  18. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1994 Jun;50(6):727-34 - PubMed
  19. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1995 Aug;89(4):443-6 - PubMed
  20. Parasitol Today. 1997 Oct;13(10):401-4 - PubMed
  21. Trop Med Parasitol. 1985 Dec;36(4):233-7 - PubMed
  22. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 May-Jun;95(3):280-4 - PubMed
  23. Clin Lab Med. 1991 Dec;11(4):977-1010 - PubMed
  24. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Nov-Dec;95(6):601-4 - PubMed
  25. Chin Med J (Engl). 1994 May;107(5):360-3 - PubMed
  26. Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Feb;8(2):158-63 - PubMed

Publication Types