Display options
Share it on

J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998 Sep;9(9):509-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1008835821107.

Bone remodelling in the pores and around load bearing transchondral isoelastic porous-coated glassy carbon implants: experimental study in rabbits.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine

T Tarvainen, I Paronen, T Tunturi, J Rautavuori, P Tormala, H Patiala, P Rokkanen

Affiliations

  1. Tampere City Hospital, Department of Surgery, Finland.

PMID: 15348848 DOI: 10.1023/a:1008835821107

Abstract

Cylinders of porous-coated glassy carbon were implanted into drill holes made through the articular surface of the medial condyle of both tibiae of ten rabbits for six and 12 weeks. Bone ingrowth and remodelling was examined by radiographic, histologic, oxytetracycline-fluorescence and microradiographic methods. Bone ingrowth into pores and load bearing implants was seen by all examination methods. Bone ingrowth occurred earlier when the pores were facing cancellous bone than cortical bone. Appositional bone formation occurred on the trabeculae a few millimetres from the interface during the early phase of remodelling at six weeks. At 12 weeks resorptive remodelling had occurred both in the surroundings and in those pores that face cancellous bone, whereas the amount of bone still increased in the pores facing cortical bone. In its porous-coated form glassy carbon functions well as a frame for ingrowing bone and it shows good osteoconductivity. Its mechanical properties are suitable for functioning as a structural bone substitute in places where the loads are mainly compressive. The difference between findings at six and 12 weeks indicated physiologic stress distribution and the adverse effects of stiff materials on bone remodelling were avoided by using this isoelastic material.

References

  1. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3(3):192-5 - PubMed
  2. Calcif Tissue Int. 1979;29(3):225-37 - PubMed
  3. J Biomech. 1988;21(3):177-81 - PubMed
  4. J Arthroplasty. 1988;3(3):249-62 - PubMed
  5. Clin Mater. 1994;17 (2):93-8 - PubMed
  6. J Orthop Res. 1983;1(2):129-35 - PubMed
  7. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):145-53 - PubMed
  8. Ann Biomed Eng. 1986;14(5):417-24 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978 Nov;60-B(4):520-2 - PubMed
  10. Am J Pathol. 1938 Mar;14(2):237-43 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Jan;69(1):45-55 - PubMed
  12. J Biomech. 1988;21(2):155-68 - PubMed
  13. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979 Sep;13(5):799-810 - PubMed
  14. Biomaterials. 1984 Mar;5(2):59-64 - PubMed
  15. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985 Feb;56(1):63-6 - PubMed
  16. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Jun;(166):301-12 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):1013-22 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Nov;77(11):1742-54 - PubMed
  19. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978 Sep;(135):192-217 - PubMed
  20. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970 Nov-Dec;73:209-31 - PubMed
  21. Implant Dent. 1995 Winter;4(4):235-43 - PubMed
  22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):300-9 - PubMed
  23. Science. 1976 Dec 10;194(4270):1174-6 - PubMed
  24. J Biomech. 1974 May;7(3):271-5 - PubMed
  25. Biomaterials. 1981 Jul;2(3):182-4 - PubMed
  26. Biomed Eng. 1975 Apr;10(4):126-31 - PubMed
  27. J Biomed Mater Res. 1973;7(3):97-108 - PubMed
  28. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Dec;69(9):1459-66 - PubMed
  29. J Biomed Mater Res. 1972 May;6(3):279-82 - PubMed

Publication Types