Display options
Share it on

Immun Ageing. 2004 Nov 12;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1742-4933-1-4.

Association between monocyte Fcgamma subclass expression and acute coronary syndrome.

Immunity & ageing : I & A

David C Calverley, Taya Varteresian, Elizabeth Brass, Denice D Tsao-Wei, Susan Groshen, Wendy J Mack, Thomas A Buchanan, Howard N Hodis, Alan D Schreiber

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; USA. [email protected].

PMID: 15679933 PMCID: PMC544957 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4933-1-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis lesions contain abundant immunoglobulins complexed with oxidized LDL (OxLDL) that are endocytosed by macrophages to form foam cells. While recent evidence supports a role for the macrophage scavenger receptor pathway in 75-90% of OxLDL uptake, in vitro evidence suggests another potential uptake pathway could involve autoantibody binding to IgG subclass-specific Fc receptors. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To address this mechanism from an in vivo standpoint, the objective of this study was to utilize flow cytometry to prospectively determine monocyte Fcgamma (FcR) I, II, and III receptor expression levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n = 48), diabetes mellitus (DM, n = 59), or neither (C, n = 88). RESULTS: Increased FcR I expression was found in the ACS versus DM groups [geometric mean, (95% CI) = 2.26 (2.07, 2.47) versus 1.83 (1.69, 1.98) (p < 0.001)] and versus C [1.90 (1.78, 2.03) (p = 0.005)]. Similar relationships were found with both the FcR II receptor [ACS mean = 4.57 (4.02, 5.19) versus DM 3.61 (3.22, 4.05) (p = 0.021) and versus C 3.86 (3.51, 4.24) (p = 0.09)] and FcR III receptor [ACS mean = 1.55 (1.44, 1.68) versus DM 1.36 (1.27, 1.46) (p = 0.038) and versus C 1.37 (1.30, 1.45) (p = 0.032)]. There was no difference between DM and C groups in FcR I, II or III expression. CONCLUSIONS: This in vivo data supports a possible second OxLDL-autoantibody macrophage uptake mechanism through an Fc receptor-mediated pathway and a potential relationship between atherosclerotic plaque macrophage FcR levels and ACS.

References

  1. Br J Haematol. 1973 Mar;24(3):275-85 - PubMed
  2. Cell Immunol. 1985 Oct 15;95(2):368-79 - PubMed
  3. Atherosclerosis. 2002 Oct;164(2):261-7 - PubMed
  4. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992 Nov;12(11):1258-66 - PubMed
  5. Arteriosclerosis. 1984 Jul-Aug;4(4):323-40 - PubMed
  6. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Jan;14(1):32-40 - PubMed
  7. Am J Cardiol. 1991 Sep 3;68(7):28B-35B - PubMed
  8. Atherosclerosis. 1985 Dec;58(1-3):1-15 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Med. 1988 Sep 1;168(3):1041-59 - PubMed
  10. Br J Haematol. 2003 Apr;121(1):139-42 - PubMed
  11. Circulation. 2002 May 7;105(18):e138-43 - PubMed
  12. Clin Immunol. 1999 Feb;90(2):153-6 - PubMed
  13. Diabetes. 1997 Mar;46(3):327-34 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 2000 Sep 14;407(6801):233-41 - PubMed
  15. Atherosclerosis. 1990 Apr;81(3):183-9 - PubMed
  16. Nat Med. 2002 Nov;8(11):1218-26 - PubMed
  17. Front Biosci. 2001 Mar 01;6:D429-55 - PubMed
  18. Biochem J. 1995 Oct 15;311 ( Pt 2):471-8 - PubMed
  19. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1991 Apr;59(1):37-52 - PubMed
  20. Atherosclerosis. 1997 Dec;135(2):161-70 - PubMed
  21. Microbes Infect. 2001 Feb;3(2):149-59 - PubMed
  22. Clin Immunol. 1999 Feb;90(2):165-72 - PubMed
  23. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):519-29 - PubMed
  24. J Intern Med. 2000 Mar;247(3):371-80 - PubMed
  25. Thromb Haemost. 2001 Jul;86(1):276-88 - PubMed
  26. J Clin Invest. 2002 Mar;109(6):721-4 - PubMed
  27. J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 20;277(51):49982-8 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Immunol. 1995 Feb;25(2):466-73 - PubMed
  29. Nature. 1989 Dec 14;342(6251):805-7 - PubMed
  30. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001 Dec;21(12):1876-90 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support