Display options
Share it on

Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1523-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2. Epub 2005 Oct 26.

Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Surgical endoscopy

F J Carter, M P Schijven, R Aggarwal, T Grantcharov, N K Francis, G B Hanna, J J Jakimowicz,

Affiliations

  1. The Cuschieri Skills Centre, Ninewells Hospital, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland. [email protected]

PMID: 16252077 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0384-2

Abstract

The Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes is a newly formed sub-group of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES). This work group undertook a review of validation evidence for surgical simulators and the resulting consensus is presented in this article. Using clinical guidelines criteria, the evidence for validation for six different simulators was rated and subsequently translated to a level of recommendation for each system. The simulators could be divided into two basic types; systems for laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selection of simulators for inclusion in this consensus was based on their availability and relatively widespread usage as of July 2004. Whilst level 2 recommendations were achieved for a few systems, it was clear that there was an overall lack of published validation studies with rigorous experimental methodology. Since the consensus meeting, there have been a number of new articles, system upgrades and new devices available. The work group intends to update these consensus guidelines on a regular basis, with the resulting article available on the EAES website (http://www.eaes-eur.org ).

References

  1. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):126-9 - PubMed
  2. Surg Endosc. 2003 May;17(5):803-10 - PubMed
  3. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Nov;7(7):871-7; discussion 877-8 - PubMed
  4. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Nov;8(7):876-82; discussion 882 - PubMed
  5. Br J Surg. 2004 Aug;91(8):956-64 - PubMed
  6. Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50 - PubMed
  7. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4 - PubMed
  8. BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):666-70 - PubMed
  9. Am J Surg. 1999 Feb;177(2):171-5 - PubMed
  10. Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):229-34 - PubMed
  11. Am J Surg. 2003 Feb;185(2):146-9 - PubMed
  12. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):33-7 - PubMed
  13. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1220-6 - PubMed
  14. Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1085-9 - PubMed
  15. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jun;57(7):886-90 - PubMed
  16. Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):660-5 - PubMed
  17. Endoscopy. 2002 Sep;34(9):698-702 - PubMed
  18. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1478-83 - PubMed
  19. Surg Endosc. 2002 Mar;16(3):406-11 - PubMed
  20. Surg Endosc. 2001 Mar;15(3):242-4 - PubMed
  21. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):214-8 - PubMed
  22. Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1583-9 - PubMed
  23. Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1746-52 - PubMed
  24. Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):328-33 - PubMed
  25. Endoscopy. 2000 Nov;32(11):911-3 - PubMed
  26. Surg Endosc. 2002 Sep;16(9):1324-8 - PubMed
  27. Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types