Display options
Cite
Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, et al. Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89(6):899-913doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(6), 899-913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
Judd, Charles M, et al. "Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth." Journal of personality and social psychology vol. 89,6 (2005): 899-913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
Judd CM, James-Hawkins L, Yzerbyt V, Kashima Y. Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):899-913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899. PMID: 16393023.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;89(6):899-913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899.

Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth.

Journal of personality and social psychology

Charles M Judd, Laurie James-Hawkins, Vincent Yzerbyt, Yoshihisa Kashima

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 80309, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 16393023 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899

Abstract

In seems there are two dimensions that underlie most judgments of traits, people, groups, and cultures. Although the definitions vary, the first makes reference to attributes such as competence, agency, and individualism, and the second to warmth, communality, and collectivism. But the relationship between the two dimensions seems unclear. In trait and person judgment, they are often positively related; in group and cultural stereotypes, they are often negatively related. The authors report 4 studies that examine the dynamic relationship between these two dimensions, experimentally manipulating the location of a target of judgment on one and examining the consequences for the other. In general, the authors' data suggest a negative dynamic relationship between the two, moderated by factors the impact of which they explore.

Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support