Display options
Cite
Rice M, Broome ME, Habermann B, et al. Implementing the research budget. West J Nurs Res. 2006;28(2):234-41doi: 10.1177/0193945905282971.
Rice, M., Broome, M. E., Habermann, B., Kang, D. H., & Davis, L. L. (2006). Implementing the research budget. Western journal of nursing research, 28(2), 234-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905282971
Rice, Marti, et al. "Implementing the research budget." Western journal of nursing research vol. 28,2 (2006): 234-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945905282971
Rice M, Broome ME, Habermann B, Kang DH, Davis LL. Implementing the research budget. West J Nurs Res. 2006 Mar;28(2):234-41. doi: 10.1177/0193945905282971. PMID: 16513921.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

West J Nurs Res. 2006 Mar;28(2):234-41. doi: 10.1177/0193945905282971.

Implementing the research budget.

Western journal of nursing research

Marti Rice, Marion E Broome, Barbara Habermann, Duck-Hee Kang, Linda L Davis

Affiliations

  1. University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.

PMID: 16513921 DOI: 10.1177/0193945905282971

Abstract

Reworking a reduced budget after the award and monitoring and managing the budget once funds are received are critical to the success of a research project. Few resources are available to help principal investigators and research teams deal with these components of grant implementation. This article will address strategies and concerns related to the revision of the postaward budget and the implementation of the budget. Among the strategies discussed for the revision of the postaward budget are cost sharing, renegotiation with administration, and reallocation of funds. Also addressed are topics related to monitoring and managing the budget, including understanding budget guidelines, account management and documentation, tracking expenditures, and challenges in grant budget management.

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support