Plant Physiol. 1974 Apr;53(4):533-42. doi: 10.1104/pp.53.4.533.
The chloroplast and cytoplasmic ribosomes of euglena: I. Stability of chloroplast ribosomes prepared by an improved procedure.
Plant physiology
S D Schwartzbach, G Freyssinet, J A Schiff
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02154.
PMID: 16658740
PMCID: PMC541394 DOI: 10.1104/pp.53.4.533
Abstract
A new isolation procedure has resulted in an improved yield of stable 68S chloroplast ribosomes from Euglena gracilis var. bacillaris. Chloroplasts are isolated by suspending the cells in buffer I (sorbitol, 250 mm; sucrose, 250 mm; Ficoll, 2.5% [w/v]; magnesium acetate, 1 mm; bovine serum albumin, 0.01% [w/v]; mercaptoethanol, 14 mm; N-2-hydroxyethyl-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.6, 5 mm) and passing through a French press at less than 1500 pounds per square inch. The crude chloroplasts are purified by three washings with buffer II (sorbitol, 150 mm; sucrose, 150 mm; Ficoll, 2.5% [w/v]; magnesium acetate, 1 mm; bovine serum albumin, 0.01% [w/v]; mercaptoethanol, 14 mm; N-2-hydroxyethyl-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.6, 5 mm). Stable 68S chloroplast ribosomes are obtained when the isolated chloroplasts are resuspended in ribosome buffer (tris-HCI, pH 7.6, 10 mm; magnesium acetate, 12 mm; KCI, 60 mm) containing spermidine, 0.5 mm; mercaptoethanol, 14 mm; sucrose, 8% (w/w), passed through a French press at 4000 pounds per square inch and extracted with either 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate or 1.0% (v/v) Triton X-100. At 0 to 4 C in ribosome buffer, the purified 68S chloroplast monosome forms a 53S particle while the 35S particle, an expected product of monosome dissociation, cannot be detected. Spermidine and mercaptoethanol prevent the formation of 53S particles from 68S monosomes. The purified 53S particles derived from 68S monosomes contain 23S RNA as well as a significant amount of 16S RNA, suggesting that this particle may not be a true ribosomal subunit.
References
- Plant Physiol. 1974 Apr;53(4):543-54 - PubMed
- Dev Biol. 1972 May;28(1):253-73 - PubMed
- J Mol Biol. 1971 Aug 14;59(3):491-503 - PubMed
- Biochemistry. 1968 Feb;7(2):668-74 - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Aug 12;246(1):81-99 - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969 Oct 22;190(2):368-80 - PubMed
- J Mol Biol. 1969 Apr 14;41(1):139-47 - PubMed
- Science. 1970 Oct 9;170(3954):171-3 - PubMed
- J Cell Biol. 1971 Nov;51(21):499-513 - PubMed
- J Cell Sci. 1972 Mar;10(2):267-305 - PubMed
- Biochemistry. 1967 Jun;6(6):1818-27 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1972 Dec 25;247(24):8043-50 - PubMed
- J Cell Biol. 1969 May;41(2):431-40 - PubMed
- Anal Biochem. 1969 Jan;27(1):130-49 - PubMed
- J Biol Chem. 1960 Jul;235:2112-6 - PubMed
- FEBS Lett. 1972 Aug 1;24(2):219-224 - PubMed
- J Bacteriol. 1969 Oct;100(1):260-8 - PubMed
- Science. 1971 Jul 16;173(3993):241-2 - PubMed
- FEBS Lett. 1970 Oct 5;10(3):149-152 - PubMed
- Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Sep 24;246(3):507-16 - PubMed
- Biochem J. 1969 Oct;114(4):847-54 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1967 Jul;42(7):922-32 - PubMed
- Plant Physiol. 1971 Feb;47(2):217-21 - PubMed
- Biochem J. 1972 Jun;128(2):353-65 - PubMed
- Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973 Jan 23;50(2):443-51 - PubMed
Publication Types