Display options
Share it on

Plant Physiol. 1986 May;81(1):216-21. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.1.216.

Responses of cultured parsley cells to elicitors from phytopathogenic fungi : timing and dose dependency of elicitor-induced reactions.

Plant physiology

E Kombrink, K Hahlbrock

Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Abteilung Biochemie, 5000 Köln 30, Federal Republic of Germany.

PMID: 16664778 PMCID: PMC1075309 DOI: 10.1104/pp.81.1.216

Abstract

Cultured parsley cells (Petroselinum crispum) responded to treatment with heat-released soluble cell-wall fragments (elicitors) from several different phytopathogenic fungi by forming coumarin derivatives (phytoalexins). This response was preceded in all cases by large but transient increases in the activities of two enzymes of general phenylpropanoid metabolism, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL). The activities of two hydrolytic enzymes, chitinase and 1,3-beta-glucanase, also increased strongly in elicitor-treated cells, whereas the activities of three enzymes participating in primary metabolism were affected differently by the elicitor treatment. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase increased, phosphofructokinase remained almost constant, and pyrophosphate:fructose-6-phosphate phosphotransferase declined sharply in activity. Different amounts of cell-wall preparations from various phytopathogenic fungi were required for maximum elicitor activity. While three oomycetes (Phytophthora spp.) yielded the most active elicitors studied (maximum coumarin accumulation at concentrations of about 10 microgram per milliliter), cell-wall preparations from an ascomycete and three deuteromycetes gave comparable results only at 10 to 100 times higher concentrations. Optimal induction of PAL, 4CL, and chitinase with Phytophthora elicitor required only about 1 microgram per milliliter, whereas 1,3-beta-glucanase induction showed a dose dependence similar to that observed for coumarins. The elicitor concentration had pronounced effects not only on the extent, but also on the timing of all induced reactions.

References

  1. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959 Aug;37(8):911-7 - PubMed
  2. Plant Physiol. 1983 Mar;71(3):460-5 - PubMed
  3. Plant Physiol. 1981 Apr;67(4):768-73 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(4):1102-6 - PubMed
  5. Plant Physiol. 1984 Feb;74(2):395-401 - PubMed
  6. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1984 Jul;232(1):240-8 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Aug 15;134(3):547-54 - PubMed
  8. J Biol Chem. 1980 Nov 25;255(22):10752-7 - PubMed
  9. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1982 Aug;217(1):65-71 - PubMed
  10. J Biol Chem. 1981 Oct 10;256(19):10061-5 - PubMed
  11. Eur J Biochem. 1976 Jan 2;61(1):199-206 - PubMed
  12. Plant Physiol. 1984 Nov;76(3):607-11 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Mar 15;131(2):401-7 - PubMed
  14. Plant Physiol. 1976 May;57(5):760-5 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Mar 15;131(2):409-13 - PubMed
  16. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1968;22:87-108 - PubMed
  17. Science. 1975 Jan 10;187(4171):74-5 - PubMed
  18. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jan 10;254(1):57-65 - PubMed

Publication Types