Display options
Share it on

Plant Physiol. 1987 Apr;83(4):772-7. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.4.772.

Comparison of the Activities and Some Properties of Pyrophosphate and ATP Dependent Fructose-6-Phosphate 1-Phosphotransferases of Phaseolus vulgaris Seeds.

Plant physiology

F C Botha, J G Small

Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of The Orange Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, Republic of South Africa.

PMID: 16665337 PMCID: PMC1056448 DOI: 10.1104/pp.83.4.772

Abstract

THE DISTRIBUTION OF PYROPHOSPHATE: fructose 6-phosphate phosphotransferase (PFP) and ATP: fructose-6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFK) was studied in germinating bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv Top Crop) seeds. In the cotyledons the PFP activity was comparable with that of PFK. However, in the plumule and radicle plus hypocotyl, PFP activity exceeds that of PFK. Approximately 70 to 90%, depending on the stage of germination, of the total PFP and PFK activities were present in the cotyledons. Highest specific activity of both enzymes, however, occurred in the radicle plus hypocotyl (64-90 nanomoles.min.milligram protein). Fractionation studies indicate that 40% of the total PFK activity was associated with the plastids while PFP is apparently confined to the cytoplasm. The cytosolic isozyme of PFK exhibits hyperbolic kinetics with respect to fructose 6-P and ATP with K(m) values of 320 and 46 micromolar, respectively. PFP also exhibits hyperbolic kinetics both in the presence and absence of the activator fructose-2,6-P(2). The activation is caused by lowering the K(m) for fructose 6-P from 18 to 1.1 millimolar and that for pyrophosphate (PPi) from 40 to 25 micromolar, respectively. Levels of fructose 2,6-P(2) and PPi in the seeds are sufficient to activate PFP and thereby enable a glycolytic role for PFP during germination. However, the fructose 6-P content appears to be well below the K(m) of PFP for this compound and would therefore preferentially bind to the catalytic site of PFK, which has a lower K(m) for fructose 6-P. The ATP content appears to be at saturating levels for PFK.

References

  1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1980 Oct 1;204(1):310-7 - PubMed
  2. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983 Sep;225(2):576-85 - PubMed
  3. Plant Physiol. 1985 Feb;77(2):358-64 - PubMed
  4. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983 Sep;225(2):586-95 - PubMed
  5. J Biol Chem. 1960 Aug;235:2278-81 - PubMed
  6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981 Dec 15;103(3):848-55 - PubMed
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(16):5051-5 - PubMed
  8. Biochem J. 1985 Apr 1;227(1):299-304 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Biochem. 1982 Dec;129(1):191-5 - PubMed
  10. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 - PubMed
  11. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jul;75(3):862-4 - PubMed
  12. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979 Jan 15;86(1):20-6 - PubMed
  13. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jan;71(1):150-5 - PubMed
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jul;79(14):4322-6 - PubMed
  15. Plant Physiol. 1983 Sep;73(1):188-91 - PubMed
  16. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1950 Jan;4(1-3):211-4 - PubMed

Publication Types