Display options
Share it on

Infect Immun. 1970 Nov;2(5):610-6. doi: 10.1128/iai.2.5.610-616.1970.

Relationship Between beta-Lactamase Activity and Resistance of Enterobacter to Cephalothin.

Infection and immunity

W E Farrar, J M Krause

Affiliations

  1. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

PMID: 16557885 PMCID: PMC416058 DOI: 10.1128/iai.2.5.610-616.1970

Abstract

The relationship between cephalosporin beta-lactamase activity and resistance to cephalothin was investigated in strains of Enterobacter cloacae and E. aerogenes. beta-Lactamase activity was detected in all strains, but a quantitative correlation between amount of beta-lactamase activity and level of resistance to cephalothin was not observed. Permeability barriers to cephalothin were observed and varied from strain to strain. beta-Lactamase activity was increased by growing organisms in the presence of penicillin G. These enzymes hydrolyzed cephalosporins more rapidly than penicillins. Penicillinase-resistant penicillins, especially those of the isoxazolyl series, effectively inhibited Enterobacter beta-lactamase. A synergistic antibacterial effect was observed when organisms were exposed to cephalothin and oxacillin in combination, and the resistance of even very small inocula to cephalothin was reduced by addition of oxacillin. Oxacillin probably exerts its effect by inhibiting beta-lactamase at an intracellular site. Intracellular beta-lactamase may make an important contribution to the resistance of even small inocula of gram-negative bacilli to cephalosporin and penicillin antibiotics. Although beta-lactamase plays a significant role in the resistance of Enterobacter to cephalothin, other factors, such as permeability barriers, also participate in determining the level of resistance.

References

  1. Biochem J. 1966 Sep;100(3):675-82 - PubMed
  2. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1969 Jun;21(6):337-58 - PubMed
  3. Am J Clin Pathol. 1952 Aug;22(8):806-8 - PubMed
  4. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda). 1967;7:271-8 - PubMed
  5. Biochem J. 1966 Dec;101(3):40C-2C - PubMed
  6. Science. 1945 Sep 21;102(2647):309 - PubMed
  7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967 Sep 27;145(2):237-47 - PubMed
  8. J Gen Microbiol. 1967 Nov;49(2):277-85 - PubMed
  9. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Mar;127(3):915-9 - PubMed
  10. Nature. 1965 May 8;206(984):579-83 - PubMed
  11. Nature. 1965 Oct 16;208(5007):239-41 - PubMed
  12. J Bacteriol. 1969 Feb;97(2):961 - PubMed
  13. J Bacteriol. 1969 May;98(2):394-7 - PubMed
  14. J Gen Microbiol. 1965 Jul;40(1):119-26 - PubMed
  15. Biochem J. 1965 Sep;96(3):739-52 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Microbiol. 1965 Nov;41(2):175-84 - PubMed
  17. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda). 1966;6:321-7 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 1961 Aug 26;191:926-7 - PubMed
  19. Lancet. 1963 Jun 29;1(7296):1399-401 - PubMed
  20. Biochem J. 1963 Apr;87:209-14 - PubMed
  21. J Gen Microbiol. 1963 Jul;32:77-89 - PubMed
  22. J Gen Microbiol. 1964 Jan;34:85-98 - PubMed
  23. Nature. 1964 Mar 7;201:1032 - PubMed
  24. Ann Intern Med. 1967 Oct;67(4):733-43 - PubMed

Publication Types