Display options
Share it on

J Athl Train. 2006 Jan-Mar;41(1):46-51.

A comparison of bioelectrical impedance and skinfold measurements in determining minimum wrestling weights in high school wrestlers.

Journal of athletic training

Ronald K Hetzler, Iris F Kimura, Karin Haines, Michelle Labotz, Joseph Smith

Affiliations

  1. University of Hawaii, Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

PMID: 16619094 PMCID: PMC1421483

Abstract

CONTEXT: Whether bioelectrical impedance and skinfold analysis can be used interchangeably to establish minimal wrestling weights (MWWs) is unknown. Using both methods in a particular program may result in the misclassification of some athletes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the MWW calculated from skinfold measurements with those derived from 5 bioelectrical impedance equations and determine if the 2 methods could be used interchangeably for high school wrestlers.

DESIGN: Repeated measurements were obtained using bioelectrical impedance and skinfold analysis to determine MWWs. Data were collected during the preseason.

SETTING: High school.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eight wrestlers (151 males, 57 females), aged 13 to 18 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The bioelectrical impedance analysis was conducted with the MWW protocol administered annually by certified athletic trainers. The resistance and reactance were used in 5 equations to investigate the level of agreement between bioelectrical impedance and skinfold analysis for determining MWW. The MWWs were based on a minimum body fat of 7.0% for males and 14.0% for females.

RESULTS: When comparing bioelectrical impedance and skinfold analysis, we found prediction error ranged from 1.51 to 2.34 kg for males and 0.27 to 9.16 kg for females.

CONCLUSIONS: To protect the health of the athletes and maintain competitive equity, a single method should be used to determine MWWs. Bioelectrical impedance and skinfold analysis cannot be used interchangeably to determine MWWs.

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Aug;27(8):1220-4 - PubMed
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):151-8 - PubMed
  3. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1990 Dec;30(4):434-40 - PubMed
  4. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12(3):175-81 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Apr;60(4):1327-32 - PubMed
  6. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1998 Feb 20;47(6):105-8 - PubMed
  7. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Sep;87(3):1114-22 - PubMed
  8. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Nov;24(11):1298-302 - PubMed
  9. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Jan;72(1):366-73 - PubMed
  10. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Jun;28(6):ix-xii - PubMed
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):639-47 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
  13. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 May;86(5):1728-38 - PubMed
  14. J Strength Cond Res. 2001 May;15(2):157-60 - PubMed
  15. J Athl Train. 2004 Jun;39(2):162-165 - PubMed
  16. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Sep;23(9):1102-10 - PubMed
  17. Hum Biol. 1981 May;53(2):181-225 - PubMed
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Feb;23(2):247-53 - PubMed
  19. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Sep 26;110:113-40 - PubMed
  20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988 Jun;20(3):310-6 - PubMed
  21. Va Med Q. 1995 Summer;122(3):179-83, 185 - PubMed

Publication Types