Display options
Share it on

J Virol. 1975 May;15(5):1158-67. doi: 10.1128/JVI.15.5.1158-1167.1975.

Interactions of Polyoma and Mouse DNAs III. Mechanism of Polyoma Pseudovirion Formation.

Journal of virology

H Türler

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland.

PMID: 16789151 PMCID: PMC354570 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.15.5.1158-1167.1975

Abstract

In primary mouse kidney cell cultures infected with polyoma virus, the processes leading to virion and pseudovirion formation were studied. By photometric DNA quantitation, we followed the kinetics of mouse and polyoma DNA synthesis and the formation of low-molecular-weight fragmented mouse DNA (mouse f-DNA). Virus was harvested at different times and analyzed for its proportion of pseudovirions. The following correlations between the intracellular events and the production of virions and pseudovirions were found. (i) Syntheses of cellular and viral DNA were closely linked, both in time and in rates of synthesis. (ii) An increase of mouse f-DNA could only be detected several hours after the onset of mouse and polyoma DNA replication; its formation coincided in time with the appearance of progeny virus. (iii) The proportion of pseudovirions was not dependent on the amount of mouse f-DNA formed, but seemed to be inversely related to the amount of viral DNA synthesized. This was borne out by experiments in which DNA synthesis was partially inhibited by mitomycin C or after a synchronized onset of DNA replication. Under these conditions, virus preparations with a two- to threefold increased proportion of pseudovirions were obtained as compared with those from uninhibited cultures. Virus isolated from the remaining monolayer always had a higher proportion of pseudovirions than virus isolated at the same time from the supernatant medium only; also, the proportion of pseudovirions increased slightly with time after infection. Thus, according to the experimental conditions used, polyoma virus preparations with a low (10 to 20%) or a high (60 to 80%) proportion of pseudovirions can be obtained.

References

  1. Virology. 1968 Apr;34(4):571-82 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Oct;58(4):1381-8 - PubMed
  3. J Virol. 1970 Apr;5(4):451-7 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Dec;67(4):1886-93 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 May;57(5):1514-21 - PubMed
  6. Anal Biochem. 1966 Oct;17(1):100-7 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 1965 Apr 3;206:93 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963 Oct;50:730-8 - PubMed
  9. Virology. 1963 Feb;19:158-68 - PubMed
  10. Virology. 1958 Aug;6(1):290-1 - PubMed
  11. J Mol Biol. 1974 Apr 15;84(3):423-44 - PubMed
  12. Virology. 1974 Mar;58(1):75-85 - PubMed
  13. J Virol. 1974 Feb;13(2):285-90 - PubMed
  14. J Virol. 1974 Feb;13(2):276-84 - PubMed
  15. J Virol. 1974 Mar;13(3):567-76 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Virol. 1972 Feb;14(2):141-55 - PubMed
  17. J Virol. 1972 Feb;9(2):317-25 - PubMed
  18. J Virol. 1972 Feb;9(2):309-16 - PubMed
  19. Virology. 1972 Feb;47(2):360-9 - PubMed
  20. J Virol. 1972 May;9(5):800-3 - PubMed
  21. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1971 Dec 20;273(25):2650-3 - PubMed
  22. J Virol. 1972 Sep;10(3):410-6 - PubMed
  23. J Virol. 1972 Sep;10(3):340-6 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Oct;67(2):1011-7 - PubMed
  25. J Virol. 1971 Jun;7(6):802-12 - PubMed
  26. J Gen Virol. 1973 Sep;20(3):353-67 - PubMed
  27. Virology. 1973 Aug;54(2):384-97 - PubMed
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Jan;57(1):63-70 - PubMed
  29. J Virol. 1973 Nov;12(5):1065-71 - PubMed
  30. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1968;24(1):1-29 - PubMed
  31. Science. 1970 Apr 10;168(3928):268-71 - PubMed
  32. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 14;26(2):365-9 - PubMed
  33. J Virol. 1970 Jun;5(6):686-92 - PubMed

Publication Types