Display options
Share it on

J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(2):270-97. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007987.

Some properties of the external activation site of the sodium pump in crab nerve.

The Journal of physiology

P F Baker, C M Connelly

PMID: 16992223 PMCID: PMC1395814 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007987

Abstract

1. Methods are described for using the changes in respiration of intact Libinia nerve to follow the rate of energy utilization by the sodium pump in this tissue.2. Short tetani in 10 K(Na)ASW (artificial sea water in which Na is the major cation and the potassium concentration is 10 mM) increased the oxygen uptake which then declined exponentially. From the net influx of Na during the tetanus and the associated oxygen uptake, values between 1.9 and 3.4 were calculated for the Na: approximately P ratio. After longer tetani, the recovery curve was S-shaped.3. The pump was activated by potassium ions in the external medium and this activation was competitively inhibited by external sodium ions. The data are consistent with a Michaelis constant (K(m)) for external potassium of 1 mM and an inhibitor constant (K(i)) for external sodium of 60 mM.4. In activating the pump, K could be replaced by Tl(+), Rb, NH(4) and Cs ions; but, of the monovalent ions tested, sodium seemed to be unique in its inhibitory action.5. In sea waters containing 460 mM-Na, ouabain behaved like a mixed inhibitor of the pump, reducing both the maximum velocity and the apparent affinity for external potassium. At a given ouabain concentration, reducing the sodium content of the medium was without effect on the maximum rate of pumping; but the apparent affinity for potassium increased more steeply than in a ouabain-free solution.6. The rate of energy utilization associated with pumping was unaffected by inclusion of quite high concentrations of sulphydryl-blocking agents in the external medium.

References

  1. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):486-505 - PubMed
  2. J Physiol. 1961 Apr;156:274-93 - PubMed
  3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Feb;23(2):394-401 - PubMed
  4. J Physiol. 1957 Apr 3;136(1):148-73 - PubMed
  5. J Physiol. 1960 Jul;152:591-600 - PubMed
  6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1963 Jan 18;10:79-84 - PubMed
  7. J Physiol. 1963 Nov;169:452-65 - PubMed
  8. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:862-78 - PubMed
  9. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Sep 25;88:458-60 - PubMed
  10. Nature. 1964 Dec 26;204:1312-3 - PubMed
  11. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jan 25;94:89-96 - PubMed
  12. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1965 Jan;14:167-83 - PubMed
  13. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:305-25 - PubMed
  14. J Biol Chem. 1965 May;240:2181-7 - PubMed
  15. J Physiol. 1955 Apr 28;128(1):28-60 - PubMed
  16. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;147:591-625 - PubMed
  17. J Biol Chem. 1960 Jun;235:1796-802 - PubMed
  18. Biochem J. 1965 Oct;97(1):214-27 - PubMed
  19. J Physiol. 1929 Jul 25;67(4):325-42 - PubMed
  20. Biochem J. 1964 Nov;93(2):337-48 - PubMed
  21. Biochem J. 1964 Nov;93(2):349-63 - PubMed
  22. J Physiol. 1965 Sep;180(2):383-423 - PubMed
  23. J Physiol. 1965 Sep;180(2):424-38 - PubMed
  24. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Jul 29;105(1):15-21 - PubMed
  25. Nature. 1965 Sep 4;207(5001):1098-9 - PubMed
  26. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1952;17:53-67 - PubMed

Publication Types