Display options
Share it on

Harm Reduct J. 2006 Nov 19;3:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-34.

Expressive writing for high-risk drug dependent patients in a primary care clinic: a pilot study.

Harm reduction journal

Karen A Baikie, Kay Wilhelm, Beverley Johnson, Mary Boskovic, Lucinda Wedgwood, Adam Finch, Gail Huon

Affiliations

  1. School of Psychiatry, Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. [email protected]

PMID: 17112389 PMCID: PMC1679799 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-34

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that expressive writing is beneficial in terms of both physical and emotional health outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of a brief expressive writing intervention for high-risk drug dependent patients in a primary care clinic, and to determine the relationship between linguistic features of writing and health outcomes.

METHODS: Participants completed four 15-minute expressive writing tasks over a week, in which they described their thoughts and feelings about a recent stressful event. Self-report measures of physical (SF-12) and psychological health (DASS-21) were administered at baseline and at a two-week follow-up. Fifty-three participants were recruited and 14 (26%) completed all measures.

RESULTS: No statistically significant benefits in physical or psychological health were found, although all outcomes changed in the direction of improvement. The intervention was well-received and was rated as beneficial by participants. The use of more positive emotion words in writing was associated with improvements in depression and stress, and flexibility in first person pronoun use was associated with improvements in anxiety. Increasing use of cognitive process words was associated with worsening depressive mood.

CONCLUSION: Although no significant benefits in physical and psychological health were found, improvements in psychological wellbeing were associated with certain writing styles and expressive writing was deemed acceptable by high-risk drug dependent patients. Given the difficulties in implementing psychosocial interventions in this population, further research using a larger sample is warranted.

References

  1. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 Jul;26(6):1025-32 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1296-312 - PubMed
  3. Addiction. 1999 Oct;94(10):1541-50 - PubMed
  4. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):520-33 - PubMed
  5. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:547-77 - PubMed
  6. Psychol Sci. 2003 Jan;14(1):60-5 - PubMed
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 May;160(5):890-5 - PubMed
  8. Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Feb-May;38(3-6):601-44 - PubMed
  9. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Nov 10;163(20):2511-7 - PubMed
  10. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Sep;192(9):629-34 - PubMed
  11. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43 - PubMed
  12. Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jul;31(6):539-48 - PubMed
  13. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33 - PubMed
  14. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Jan;35(1):79-89 - PubMed
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Apr;72(4):863-71 - PubMed
  16. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):174-84 - PubMed
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1264-72 - PubMed

Publication Types