Display options
Cite
Bajdik CD, Abanto ZU, Spinelli JJ, et al. Identifying related cancer types based on their incidence among people with multiple cancers. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006;3:17doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-17.
Bajdik, C. D., Abanto, Z. U., Spinelli, J. J., Brooks-Wilson, A., & Gallagher, R. P. (2006). Identifying related cancer types based on their incidence among people with multiple cancers. Emerging themes in epidemiology, 317. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-17
Bajdik, Chris D, et al. "Identifying related cancer types based on their incidence among people with multiple cancers." Emerging themes in epidemiology vol. 3 (2006): 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-17
Bajdik CD, Abanto ZU, Spinelli JJ, Brooks-Wilson A, Gallagher RP. Identifying related cancer types based on their incidence among people with multiple cancers. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Nov 08;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-17. PMID: 17090329; PMCID: PMC1636044.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Nov 08;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-17.

Identifying related cancer types based on their incidence among people with multiple cancers.

Emerging themes in epidemiology

Chris D Bajdik, Zenaida U Abanto, John J Spinelli, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Richard P Gallagher

Affiliations

  1. Cancer Control Research Program, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L3. [email protected]

PMID: 17090329 PMCID: PMC1636044 DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-17

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are several reasons that someone might be diagnosed with more than one primary cancer. The aim of this analysis was to determine combinations of cancer types that occur more often than expected. The expected values in previous analyses are based on age-and-gender-adjusted risks in the population. However, if cancer in people with multiple primaries is somehow different than cancer in people with a single primary, then the expected numbers should not be based on all diagnoses in the population.

METHODS: In people with two or more cancer types, the probability that a specific type is diagnosed was determined as the number of diagnoses for that cancer type divided by the total number of cancer diagnoses. If two types of cancer occur independently of one another, then the probability that someone will develop both cancers by chance is the product of the individual probabilities for each type. The expected number of people with both cancers is the number of people at risk multiplied by the separate probabilities for each cancer. We performed the analysis on records of cancer diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada between 1970 and 2004.

RESULTS: There were 28,159 people with records of multiple primary cancers between 1970 and 2004, including 1,492 people with between three and seven diagnoses. Among both men and women, the combinations of esophageal cancer with melanoma, and kidney cancer with oral cancer, are observed more than twice as often as expected.

CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests there are several pairs of primary cancers that might be related by a shared etiological factor. We think that our method is more appropriate than others when multiple diagnoses of primary cancer are unlikely to be the result of therapeutic or diagnostic procedures.

References

  1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1428-37 - PubMed
  2. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:78 - PubMed
  3. Int J Cancer. 1997 Sep 4;72(5):776-9 - PubMed
  4. Cancer. 1999 Nov 15;86(10):2014-20 - PubMed
  5. JAMA. 2003 Jul 23;290(4):465-75 - PubMed
  6. Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Jun;16(5):475-81 - PubMed
  7. Int J Cancer. 1995 Jun 9;61(6):773-9 - PubMed
  8. Br J Cancer. 2003 Jan 13;88(1):74-8 - PubMed
  9. BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1491-5 - PubMed
  10. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Aug;45(2):155-61 - PubMed
  11. Br J Dermatol. 2001 Dec;145(6):981-5 - PubMed
  12. Int J Cancer. 2001 Jul 15;93(2):155-61 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004 Feb;13(1):33-7 - PubMed
  14. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jan 4;98(1):15-25 - PubMed
  15. Oncology (Williston Park). 2005 Apr;19(4):455-63; discussion 463-4, 466, 469 - PubMed
  16. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Sep 15;142(6):653-65 - PubMed

Publication Types