Display options
Cite
Zhao M, Hibbert DB, Gooding JJ. Determination of sulfite in beer samples using an amperometric fill and flow channel biosensor employing sulfite oxidase. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;556(1):195-200doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083.
Zhao, M., Hibbert, D. B., & Gooding, J. J. (2006). Determination of sulfite in beer samples using an amperometric fill and flow channel biosensor employing sulfite oxidase. Analytica chimica acta, 556(1), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083
Zhao, Min, et al. "Determination of sulfite in beer samples using an amperometric fill and flow channel biosensor employing sulfite oxidase." Analytica chimica acta vol. 556,1 (2006): 195-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083
Zhao M, Hibbert DB, Gooding JJ. Determination of sulfite in beer samples using an amperometric fill and flow channel biosensor employing sulfite oxidase. Anal Chim Acta. 2006 Jan 18;556(1):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083. Epub 2005 Jul 14. PMID: 17723349.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Anal Chim Acta. 2006 Jan 18;556(1):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

Determination of sulfite in beer samples using an amperometric fill and flow channel biosensor employing sulfite oxidase.

Analytica chimica acta

Min Zhao, D Brynn Hibbert, J Justin Gooding

Affiliations

  1. School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

PMID: 17723349 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.05.083

Abstract

A simple method is described to determine sulfite in beer samples using a fill and flow channel biosensor. A droplet of sample is placed into the inlet of a rectangular flow cell and begins to flow through the channel by capillarity. The flow is maintained and controlled by a porous outlet plug of defined porosity. In a rectangular flow cell, the sample solution flows through three consecutive zones: over a predictor electrode, an enzyme layer and a detector electrode. Together these three zones enable the differentiation between current due to sulfite and current due to other electroactive species in the sample. The predictor electrode is located upstream, and on the opposite channel wall to the enzyme layer and detector electrode, and is poised at the same potential (+0.65 V versus Ag/AgCl) as the detector electrode. On this electrode, the current contribution from all species in the sample solution that are oxidized at that potential is determined. The enzyme layer contains sulfite oxidase, which, in the process of oxidizing sulfite, produces hydrogen peroxide, which itself is reduced by excess sulfite. The current at the downstream detector electrode is therefore different from that at the predictor electrode as a result of the enzyme reaction and the difference of the currents, corrected for the dimensions of the electrodes, is proportional to the concentration of sulfite. The method enables a straightforward correction of the interfering current at the detector electrode and a determination of the analyte concentration. The effect of interferences from ascorbic acid, ethanol, sorbic acid and tartaric acid in the detection of sulfite is efficiently removed. The concentration of sulfite in a sample of beer measured by the biosensor is equivalent to that measured using a reference method based on the AOAC-recommended Monier-Williams method.

Publication Types