Behav Brain Funct. 2007 Jul 26;3:35. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-35.
1Controlled evaluation of a neurofeedback training of slow cortical potentials in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
Behavioral and brain functions : BBF
Renate Drechsler, Marc Straub, Mirko Doehnert, Hartmut Heinrich, Hans-Christoph Steinhausen, Daniel Brandeis
PMID: 17655749
PMCID: PMC1988816 DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-35
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several promising studies on neurofeedback training in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have been performed in recent years, the specificity of positive treatment effects continues to be challenged.
METHODS: To evaluate the specificity of a neurofeedback training of slow cortical potentials, a twofold strategy was pursued: First, the efficacy of neurofeedback training was compared to a group training program for children with ADHD. Secondly, the extent of improvements observed in the neurofeedback group in relation to successful regulation of cortical activation was examined. Parents and teachers rated children's behaviour and executive functions before and after treatment. In addition, children underwent neuropsychological testing before and after training.
RESULTS: According to parents' and teachers' ratings, children of the neurofeedback training group improved more than children who had participated in a group therapy program, particularly in attention and cognition related domains. On neuropsychological measures children of both groups showed similar improvements. However, only about half of the neurofeedback group learned to regulate cortical activation during a transfer condition without direct feedback. Behavioural improvements of this subgroup were moderately related to neurofeedback training performance, whereas effective parental support accounted better for some advantages of neurofeedback training compared to group therapy according to parents' and teachers' ratings.
CONCLUSION: There is a specific training effect of neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials due to enhanced cortical control. However, non-specific factors, such as parental support, may also contribute to the positive behavioural effects induced by the neurofeedback training.
References
- J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Mar;32(1):153-65 - PubMed
- Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2003 Mar;28(1):1-12 - PubMed
- Am J Med Genet. 2000 Jun 12;96(3):244-50 - PubMed
- Behav Modif. 2006 Mar;30(2):159-83 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1530-40 - PubMed
- Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(1):113-22 - PubMed
- J Atten Disord. 2003 Sep;7(1):43-55 - PubMed
- Physiol Rev. 1990 Jan;70(1):1-41 - PubMed
- Biofeedback Self Regul. 1995 Mar;20(1):83-99 - PubMed
- Biofeedback Self Regul. 1996 Mar;21(1):35-49 - PubMed
- Epilepsia. 2001 Mar;42(3):406-16 - PubMed
- Biofeedback Self Regul. 1976 Sep;1(3):293-306 - PubMed
- Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Apr 1;55(7):772-5 - PubMed
- Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Jan;24(1):7-12 - PubMed
- Epilepsy Res. 1993 Jan;14(1):63-72 - PubMed
- Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Aug;47(8):539-45 - PubMed
- Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;931:376-84 - PubMed
- Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Dec;30(4):365-73 - PubMed
- Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Jun;30(2):95-114 - PubMed
- Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Jan;55(1):23-34 - PubMed
- Appl Neuropsychol. 2005;12(2):64-76 - PubMed
- Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2004 Dec;29(4):233-43 - PubMed
- Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Aug;26(4):486-502 - PubMed
- Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1248-55 - PubMed
- Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13 Suppl 1:I117-29 - PubMed
- J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008 Oct;115(10):1445-56 - PubMed
- J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;48(1):3-16 - PubMed
- Br J Psychiatry. 1986 Dec;149:760-7 - PubMed
- Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2006;55(5):384-407 - PubMed
- Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2002 Dec;27(4):231-49 - PubMed
Publication Types