Display options
Cite
Ratliff J, Anand N, Vaccaro AR, et al. Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons. World J Emerg Surg. 2007;2:24doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-24.
Ratliff, J., Anand, N., Vaccaro, A. R., Lim, M. R., Lee, J. Y., Arnold, P., Harrop, J. S., Rampersaud, R., Bono, C. M., Gahr, R. H. (2007). Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons. World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-24
Ratliff, John, et al. "Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons." World journal of emergency surgery : WJES vol. 2 (2007): 24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-2-24
Ratliff J, Anand N, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Lee JY, Arnold P, Harrop JS, Rampersaud R, Bono CM, Gahr RH. Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons. World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Sep 07;2:24. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-24. PMID: 17825106; PMCID: PMC2045082.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Sep 07;2:24. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-24.

Regional variability in use of a novel assessment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: United States versus international surgeons.

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES

John Ratliff, Neel Anand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Moe R Lim, Joon Y Lee, Paul Arnold, James S Harrop, Raja Rampersaud, Christopher M Bono, Ralf H Gahr,

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 17825106 PMCID: PMC2045082 DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-24

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable variability exists in clinical approaches to thoracolumbar fractures. Controversy in evaluation and nomenclature contribute to this confusion, with significant differences found between physicians, between different specialties, and in different geographic regions. A new classification system for thoracolumbar injuries, the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS), was recently described by Vaccaro. No assessment of regional differences has been described. We report regional variability in use of the TLISS system between United States and non-US surgeons.

METHODS: Twenty-eight spine surgeons (8 neurosurgeons and 20 orthopedic surgeons) reviewed 56 clinical thoracolumbar injury case histories, which included pertinent imaging studies. Cases were classified and scored using the TLISS system. After a three month period, the case histories were re-ordered and the physicians repeated the exercise; 22 physicians completed both surveys and were used to assess intra-rater reliability. The reliability and treatment validity of the TLISS was assessed. Surgeons were grouped into US (n = 15) and non-US (n = 13) cohorts. Inter-rater (both within and between different geographic groups) and intra-rater reliability was assessed by percent agreement, Cohen's kappa, kappa with linear weighting, and Spearman's rank-order correlation.

CONCLUSION: Non-US surgeons were found to have greater inter-rater reliability in injury mechanism, while agreement on neurological status and posterior ligamentous complex integrity tended to be higher among US surgeons. Inter-rater agreement on management was moderate, although it tended to be higher in US-surgeons. Inter-rater agreement between US and non-US surgeons was similar to within group inter-rater agreement for all categories. While intra-rater agreement for mechanism tended to be higher among US surgeons, intra-rater reliability for neurological status and PLC was slightly higher among non-US surgeons. Intra-rater reliability for management was substantial in both US and non-US surgeons. The TLISS incorporates generally accepted features of spinal injury assessment into a simple patient evaluation tool. The management recommendation of the treatment algorithm component of the TLISS shows good inter-rater and substantial intra-rater reliability in both non-US and US based spine surgeons. The TLISS may improve communication between health providers and may contribute to more efficient management of thoracolumbar injuries.

References

  1. Eur Spine J. 2005 Aug;14(6):536-40 - PubMed
  2. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Jun;18(3):209-15 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):32-9 - PubMed
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Nov-Dec;8(8):817-31 - PubMed
  5. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(7):477-82 - PubMed
  6. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR81-9 - PubMed
  7. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(1):2-18 - PubMed
  8. Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201 - PubMed
  9. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):118-22 - PubMed
  10. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Oct;22(9):1633-4 - PubMed
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2208-13 - PubMed
  12. Ann Surg. 1968 May;167(5):705-17 - PubMed
  13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 1;19(11):1201-6 - PubMed
  14. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):616-20 - PubMed
  15. Orthopade. 1999 Aug;28(8):662-81 - PubMed
  16. J Orthop Sci. 2005 Nov;10(6):671-5 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):773-81 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Dec;52(8):1534-51 - PubMed
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2325-33 - PubMed
  20. Med Care. 1998 Jun;36(6):793-803 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1423-9 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1 Suppl):12-8 - PubMed
  23. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1741-4 - PubMed

Publication Types