Display options
Share it on

Rev Diabet Stud. 2007;4(4):226-30. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2007.4.226. Epub 2008 Feb 10.

Effectiveness of an intensive nutritional intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a pilot study.

The review of diabetic studies : RDS

Mary Yannakoulia, Kalliopi-Anna Poulia, Eleni Mylona, Meropi D Kontogianni

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Harokopio University, 70 El. Venizelou St, 17671, Athens, Greece.

PMID: 18338075 PMCID: PMC2270404 DOI: 10.1900/RDS.2007.4.226

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the effects of an intensive nutritional intervention with usual care conditions on dropout rate, body weight, lifestyle changes and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thirty outpatients with T2DM but without insulin treatment (mean age: 57 +/- 9 yr) were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups: intensive care (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients in the UC group were given advice about dietary and physical activity goals in one consultation session at baseline, while patients in the IC group attended five goal-oriented consultation sessions held approximately every two weeks from baseline onwards. Changes in body weight, T2DM knowledge, dietary intake, physical activity, HbA1c, and percentage of dropouts were evaluated at 1-year follow-up post-intervention. Fifty percent of patients quitted the program and were classified as "dropouts". Program completers were older and included a lower percentage of newly diagnosed T2DM compared with dropouts. A tendency to a negative association between attendance of the IC group and the likelihood of dropping out was found (p = 0.08). No difference was detected between UC and IC groups regarding changes in body weight, HbA1c or other outcome measures, at post-intervention or 1-year follow-up. This pilot study did not confirm advantages of intensive nutritional intervention in T2DM patients in terms of glycemic control, body weight, diet and physical activity. However, the high dropout rate may have hampered its effectiveness.

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):556-61 - PubMed
  2. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25(1):148-98 - PubMed
  3. Rev Diabet Stud. 2006 Spring;3(1):11-6 - PubMed
  4. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Sep;24 Suppl 3:S12-20 - PubMed
  5. Diabet Med. 2004 May;21(5):491-6 - PubMed
  6. Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Oct;29(1):67-73 - PubMed
  7. Diabetes Care. 2004 Jul;27(7):1570-6 - PubMed
  8. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 Mar;93(3):276-83 - PubMed
  9. Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jun;40(3):263-78 - PubMed
  10. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jul;122(1):51-65 - PubMed
  11. Diabetologia. 2004 Mar;47(3):367-376 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007 Aug;61(8):929-37 - PubMed
  13. Metabolism. 2003 Aug;52(8 Suppl 1):19-23 - PubMed
  14. Diabetes Care. 1991 Apr;14(4):308-17 - PubMed
  15. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 10;162(11):1301-4 - PubMed
  16. Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1379-85 - PubMed
  17. Diabet Med. 2005 Jan;22(1):32-8 - PubMed
  18. Diabetes Educ. 2000 Mar-Apr;26(2):272-9 - PubMed
  19. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jun;95(6):700-1 - PubMed
  20. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):561-87 - PubMed
  21. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003 Jun;16(3):151-8 - PubMed
  22. Diabetes Care. 1992 Jul;15(7):864-9 - PubMed

Publication Types