Display options
Share it on

Drug Saf. 2008;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831010-00001.

Intelligent risk communication: can it be improved?.

Drug safety

Andrzej Czarnecki

Affiliations

  1. Global Patient Safety, Lilly Research Centre, Erlwood Manor, UK. [email protected]

PMID: 18095742 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200831010-00001

Abstract

Every year, regulators and scientists from academia and industry invest considerable time and effort into drug development, the assessment of safety, and subsequent risk-benefit communication. The observation of everyday medical practice, lay press releases and drug information indicates that all these efforts do not do justice to the work and effort invested. Risk communication is a complex scientific activity, which, when done properly, benefits patients, and when done poorly, may lead to harm. There is much misunderstanding and confusion even between professionals in communicating risk-benefit information, as the association of risk with drug treatment is a difficult concept to accept. It is apparent that the concept of intelligent risk-benefit communication has to be developed extensively on many levels and with the co-operation of everyone involved (patients, physicians, regulators, scientists, journalists, lawyers and the government). This article addresses some key aspects of dealing with the risks associated with drug treatment in everyday practice, as consideration of these risks may be of benefit to all concerned in the future.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 10;339(11):765-6 - PubMed
  2. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 26;167(6):535-6 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 10;339(11):719-24 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33 - PubMed
  5. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):136-47 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2002 Aug 28;288(8):980-7 - PubMed
  7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Oct;34(4):1159-62 - PubMed
  8. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;164(7):1044-9 - PubMed
  9. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):357-65 - PubMed
  10. Br Med J. 1975 Mar 15;1(5958):595-8 - PubMed
  11. Drug Saf. 2006;29(1):91-3 - PubMed
  12. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;18(3):215-7 - PubMed
  13. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16 Suppl 1:S16-41 - PubMed
  14. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;63(5):517-21 - PubMed
  15. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 13;355(2):125-37 - PubMed
  16. Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295-300 - PubMed
  17. Eur Heart J. 1999 Jul;20(13):917-20 - PubMed
  18. BMJ. 1996 Aug 31;313(7056):518-21 - PubMed
  19. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951 Mar;41(3):279-81 - PubMed
  20. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;164(7):1029-34 - PubMed
  21. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 21;356(25):2591-602 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types