HPB Surg. 2008;2008:825940. doi: 10.1155/2008/825940.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system.

HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery

Micheal T Schell, Anthony Barcia, Austin L Spitzer, Hobart W Harris

PMID: 18475317 PMCID: PMC2246060 DOI: 10.1155/2008/825940

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Smaller and lower-volume hospitals can attain surgical outcomes similar to high-volume centers if they incorporate the expertise and health care pathways of high-volume centers.

SETTING: The academic tertiary care center, Moffit-Long Hospital (ML); the community-based Mount Zion Hospital (ZION); the San Francisco County General Hospital (SFGH); and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center of San Francisco (VAMC).

PATIENTS: 369 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between October 1989 and June 2003 at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) affiliated hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. To correct for the potentially confounding effect of small case volumes and event rates, data for SFGH, VAMC, and ZION was combined (Small Volume Hospital Group; SVHG) and compared against data for ML.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates; three-year and five-year survival rates.

RESULTS: The average patient age and health, as determined by ASA score, were similar between ML and the SVHG. The postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly between ML and the SVGH (58.8% versus 63.1%). Patients that experienced a complication averaged 2.5 complications in both groups. The perioperative mortality rate was 4% for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at either ML or the SVGH. Although the 3-year survival rate for patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas was nearly twice as high at ML (31.2% versus 18.3% at SVHG), there was no significant difference in the 5-year survival rates (19% at ML versus 18.3% at SVHG).

CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume hospitals can achieve similar outcomes to high-volume tertiary care centers provided they import the expertise and care pathways necessary for improved results.

References

1. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 2000;89(3):225-33 - PubMed
2. World J Surg. 2003 Mar;27(3):324-9 - PubMed
3. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1451-8; discussion 1459 - PubMed
4. Br J Surg. 1997 Oct;84(10):1370-6 - PubMed
5. Surgery. 1997 Sep;122(3):553-66 - PubMed
6. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1161-4 - PubMed
7. West J Med. 1996 Nov;165(5):294-300 - PubMed
8. Arch Surg. 2004 Jul;139(7):718-25; discussion 725-7 - PubMed
9. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Apr;383(2):121-8 - PubMed
10. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37 - PubMed
11. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):379-83 - PubMed
12. Arch Surg. 1995 Mar;130(3):295-9; discussion 299-300 - PubMed
13. Surgery. 1999 Mar;125(3):250-6 - PubMed
14. Br J Surg. 1995 Jan;82(1):111-5 - PubMed
15. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511-20 - PubMed
16. Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Jun;81(3):557-74 - PubMed
17. Ann Surg. 1995 Jun;221(6):721-31; discussion 731-3 - PubMed
18. J Surg Res. 2007 Apr;138(2):189-97 - PubMed
19. JAMA. 1998 Nov 25;280(20):1747-51 - PubMed
20. Ann Surg. 1997 Sep;226(3):248-57; discussion 257-60 - PubMed
21. CMAJ. 1999 Mar 9;160(5):643-8 - PubMed
22. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):1-7 - PubMed
23. JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1191-3 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article