Display options
Share it on

Clin Drug Investig. 1998;15(6):507-14. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199815060-00007.

The bioavailability of desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol tablets relative to the oral solution.

Clinical drug investigation

T Hunt, R Geetha, E Warga

Affiliations

  1. Pharmaco LSR Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.

PMID: 18370508 DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199815060-00007

Abstract

Two studies were conducted in randomised crossover designs to determine the bioavailability of the tablet components of the 'desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol regimen (MircetteOE)' relative to an oral solution. The desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol and ethinyl estradiol regimen (28 days) consists of the following treatment: 21 days of a 150microg desogestrel (DSG)/20microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) tablet; 2 days of a lactose/starch tablet (placebo); and 5 days of a 10microg EE tablet. In each study, 20 healthy women were enrolled, received at least one dose of test drug, and were included in the analysis of tolerability; however, only 18 subjects in each study completed both crossover periods and were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In study 1, the women each received a total dose of 300microg DSG/40microg EE administered as two combination tablets or solution. The women each received a total dose of 20microg EE administered as two tablets or solution in study 2. Serial blood samples were analysed by radioimunnoassay and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from the resulting serum concentration-time profiles. The results of these studies demonstrated that the mean relative bioavailabilities of DSG (measured as 3-keto-DSG, the active metabolite of DSG) and EE from the combination tablet were 100% and 93%, respectively, and that of EE from the EE tablet was 99%. The difference in the extent of absorption for the combination tablet versus the reference solution was small; therefore the performance of both tablet formulations was near optimal. Both tablet formulations were generally well tolerated, with most of the adverse experiences reported being transient and mild.

References

  1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 1;144(5):511-8 - PubMed

Publication Types