Clin Drug Investig. 1998;16(1):9-18. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199816010-00002.
Meta-Analyses of Cisapride, Omeprazole and Ranitidine in the Treatment of GORD: Implications for Treating Patient Subgroups.
Clinical drug investigation
M Iskedjian, T R Einarson
Affiliations
Affiliations
- PharmIdeas Consulting Services, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PMID: 18370513
DOI: 10.2165/00044011-199816010-00002
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Meta-analyses of efficacy results reported in trials of the pharmacological treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with cisapride, omeprazole or ranitidine were performed using randomised, double-blind studies identified by a Medline search covering the years 1984 to 1995.
RESULTS: The overall order of efficacy following 12 weeks of acute treatment was omeprazole 40 mg/day (95% cured) > ranitidine 600 mg/day (81% cured) > cisapride 40 mg/day or ranitidine 300 mg/day (approximately 60% cured). However, important differences emerged regarding efficacy in mild versus severe GORD, and in the frequency of relapse. In mild GORD, the cure rate with cisapride 40 mg/day was greater than the cure rate with ranitidine 300 mg/day (56 vs 38%, respectively), and the cure rate with cisapride 80 mg/day was similar to the cure rate with omeprazole 20 mg/day (82 vs 75%, respectively). In severe GORD, the cure rate with cisapride 80 mg/day was half that of omeprazole 20 mg/day (43 vs 87%, respectively) and comparable with that of ranitidine 300 mg/day (50%). Among patients treated acutely with omeprazole, 6-month relapse rates were 17% with omeprazole 20 mg/day maintenance therapy, but 76 to 80% without maintenance therapy. Among patients treated acutely with cisapride, 6-month relapse rates were 33% with 20 mg/day maintenance therapy and only 40% without maintenance therapy, which compare favourably with those following 6 months' maintenance therapy with ranitidine 300 mg/day (49%).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that omeprazole is clearly the treatment of choice for severe GORD, suggest that cisapride may be the treatment of choice for mild GORD, and indicate that either of these two treatments is superior to ranitidine for the prevention of relapse. Further comparative clinical studies are needed, designed specifically to delineate the most appropriate drug therapy for various subgroups of GORD patients.
References
- Lancet. 1988 Jul 23;2(8604):229 - PubMed
- Hepatogastroenterology. 1990 Aug;37(4):403-7 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol. 1988 Jun;23(5):625-32 - PubMed
- Hepatogastroenterology. 1983 Jun;30(3):96-8 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1992 Oct;6(5):597-607 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991 Mar;26(3):248-56 - PubMed
- Gut. 1990 May;31(5):509-13 - PubMed
- Drugs. 1995 May;49(5):695-710 - PubMed
- Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 - PubMed
- Gut. 1988 May;29(5):675-81 - PubMed
- Nature. 1981 Mar 12;290(5802):159-61 - PubMed
- Dig Dis Sci. 1988 May;33(5):523-9 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Oct;7(5):501-7 - PubMed
- Arch Intern Med. 1996 Mar 11;156(5):477-84 - PubMed
- J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988 Dec;10(6):614-8 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(3):175-83 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 19;326(12):825-7 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9 Suppl 1:3-7 - PubMed
- Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1985;11(10):687-92 - PubMed
- Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1989 May;13(5):457-62 - PubMed
- Dig Dis Sci. 1990 May;35(5):649-55 - PubMed
- Hepatogastroenterology. 1986 Oct;33(5):208-13 - PubMed
- Am J Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):43-7 - PubMed
- Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Jan 9;296(6615):89-92 - PubMed
- Gut. 1993 Aug;34(8):1025-31 - PubMed
- Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Oct;4(4):677-98 - PubMed
- Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Oct;22(10):813-24 - PubMed
- Gut. 1991 Nov;32(11):1280-5 - PubMed
- Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Mar;90(3):423-30 - PubMed
- J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Jun;45(2):89-92 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1986 Nov;91(5):1198-205 - PubMed
- Lancet. 1987 Feb 14;1(8529):349-51 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Mar;28(3):224-8 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989;166:76-82; discussion 94 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1992 Jan;102(1):109-18 - PubMed
- Am J Med. 1991 Aug 8;91(2A):119S-122S - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1994 Nov;107(5):1305-11 - PubMed
- Med J Aust. 1983 Nov 26;2(11):558-61 - PubMed
- Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Mar;38(3):551-60 - PubMed
- Gut. 1990 Sep;31(9):968-72 - PubMed
- Gut. 1994 May;35(5):590-8 - PubMed
- Gastroenterology. 1988 Oct;95(4):903-12 - PubMed
- Hepatogastroenterology. 1988 Jun;35(3):125-7 - PubMed
- Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris). 1993 Jun-Sep;29(4):213-8 - PubMed
- J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Oct;15(3):192-8 - PubMed
- Digestion. 1990;45(2):109-14 - PubMed
- Digestion. 1984;29(2):119-23 - PubMed
- Br J Clin Pract. 1994 Jan-Feb;48(1):10-4 - PubMed
- Arch Surg. 1996 Oct;131(10):1021-3 - PubMed
- Gut. 1983 Oct;24(10):921-4 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Aug;7(4):409-15 - PubMed
- Hepatogastroenterology. 1987 Aug;34(4):155-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Gastroenterol. 1984 Feb;6(1):9-15 - PubMed
- Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Mar;21(2):175-80 - PubMed
- Br J Clin Pract Suppl. 1989 Feb;66:59-60; discussion 61-4 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Apr;7(2):181-90 - PubMed
- Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Dec;7(6):635-41 - PubMed
- Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Sep;42(9):1957-64 - PubMed
- Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Apr;88(4):520-4 - PubMed
Publication Types