Display options
Share it on

Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(3):351-357. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.351.

Family Caregivers of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: Predicting Caregivers at Risk for Probable Depression.

Rehabilitation psychology

Laura E Dreer, Timothy R Elliott, Richard Shewchuk, Jack W Berry, Patricia Rivera

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

PMID: 18716667 PMCID: PMC2518391 DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.52.3.351

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) with probable depression and to test the hypothesis that dysfunctional problem-solving abilities would be significantly predictive of risk status after taking into account important demographic characteristics and caregiver health. DESIGN: Correlational and logistic regression analyses of data collected in a cross-sectional design. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen men and 103 women caregivers (mean age of caregivers = 45.66 years, SD = 12.88) of individuals with SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Inventory to Diagnose Depression. RESULTS: Nineteen caregivers (15.7%) met criteria on the Inventory to Diagnose Depression for a major depressive disorder. A dysfunctional problem-solving style was significantly predictive of caregiver depression, regardless of the severity of physical impairment of the care recipient or the physical health of the caregiver and caregiver demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of caregivers with probable depressive disorder may parallel that observed among persons with SCI, using a more conservative self-report measure designed to assess symptoms associated with a depressive syndrome. Family caregivers with a dysfunctional problem-solving style and assisting individuals with more severe injuries may have probable depression.

References

  1. BMJ. 1995 Feb 18;310(6977):441-5 - PubMed
  2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Aug;21(4):222-31 - PubMed
  3. Spinal Cord. 2001 Jun;39(6):318-22 - PubMed
  4. Psychiatry Res. 1992 Sep;43(3):231-41 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67 - PubMed
  6. Stroke. 1999 Jul;30(7):1478-85 - PubMed
  7. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Jun;57(3):408-13 - PubMed
  8. Am J Psychiatry. 1979 Jul;136(7):887-94 - PubMed
  9. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Mar;174(3):150-3 - PubMed
  10. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Sep;36(3):259-73 - PubMed
  11. Paraplegia. 1995 Feb;33(2):62-8 - PubMed
  12. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Aug;78(8):822-7 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Bull. 1994 Jul;116(1):29-45 - PubMed
  14. JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9 - PubMed
  15. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):1036-48 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Bull. 2003 Nov;129(6):946-72 - PubMed
  17. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;14(3):264-9 - PubMed
  18. Health Psychol. 1998 Mar;17(2):125-9 - PubMed
  19. Brain Inj. 2000 Dec;14(12):1089-100 - PubMed
  20. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):1006-14 - PubMed
  21. Health Psychol. 2006 May;25(3):355-363 - PubMed
  22. Paraplegia. 1991 Oct;29(8):514-20 - PubMed
  23. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Feb;55(1):55-9 - PubMed
  24. Stroke. 2002 Aug;33(8):2060-5 - PubMed
  25. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Mar 15;126(6):417-25 - PubMed
  26. Stroke. 2005 Nov;36(11):2514-22 - PubMed
  27. Am J Public Health. 2002 Mar;92(3):409-13 - PubMed
  28. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;43(11):1076-81 - PubMed
  29. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):511-6 - PubMed
  30. Fam Pract. 2006 Jun;23(3):363-8 - PubMed
  31. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Aug;77(8):816-23 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support