Display options
Share it on

BMC Oral Health. 2008 Sep 02;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-8-25.

Cellular profile of the peritumoral inflammatory infiltrate in squamous cells carcinoma of oral mucosa: Correlation with the expression of Ki67 and histologic grading.

BMC oral health

Fabricio L D Vieira, Beatriz J Vieira, Marco A M Guimaraes, Fernando M Aarestrup

Affiliations

  1. UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil. [email protected]

PMID: 18764952 PMCID: PMC2556313 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-8-25

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Squamous cells carcinoma is the most important malignant tumor with primary site in the oral cavity and, given the great exposure of mucosa and lips to the etiologic factors of this neoplasm, its incidence is high. Investigation of the prognostic determinants is significant for the expectations of treatment proposal and cure of the patient. The local immune response represented by peritumoral inflammatory infiltrate is a possible prognostic factor.

METHODS: In this study, oral mucosa samples of squamous cells carcinoma were analyzed, separated according to their histological classification as well as the phenotypical profile of the cells comprising the peritumoral inflammatory infiltrate was investigated by immunohistochemical method, in addiction, the cell proliferation index via protein Ki67 expression was determinated.

RESULTS: The T lymphocytes made up most of this inflammatory infiltrate, and among these cells, there was a predominance of T CD8 lymphocytes relative to the T CD4 lymphocytes. The B lymhocytes were the second most visualized leucocyte cell type followed by macrophages and neutrophils. The immunohistochemical assessment of Ki-67 positive cells revealed a greater expression of this protein in samples of undifferentiated squamous cells carcinoma.

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the cellular immune response is the main defense mechanism in squamous cells carcinoma of oral mucosa, expressed by the large number of T lymphocytes and macrophages, and that the greatest intensity of local response may be associated with the best prognosis.

References

  1. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Jan;130(1):57-61 - PubMed
  2. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):329-39 - PubMed
  3. JAAPA. 2007 Oct;20(10):42-7 - PubMed
  4. Genes Dev. 1999 Jun 1;13(11):1382-97 - PubMed
  5. Oral Oncol. 2003 Jul;39(5):459-69 - PubMed
  6. Pancreatology. 2006;6(5):450-3 - PubMed
  7. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2002 Dec;11(4):350-2 - PubMed
  8. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;43(6):511-2 - PubMed
  9. Br J Cancer. 1994 Mar;69(3):409-16 - PubMed
  10. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Mar-Apr;71(2):181-7 - PubMed
  11. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;36(8):671-9 - PubMed
  12. Aust Dent J. 1996 Apr;41(2):91-6 - PubMed
  13. J Periodontol. 2005 Mar;76(3):406-10 - PubMed
  14. Br J Oral Surg. 1983 Jun;21(2):136-46 - PubMed
  15. Exp Cell Res. 2001 Nov 1;270(2):259-67 - PubMed
  16. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jan;99(1):64-70 - PubMed
  17. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994;251(2):91-4 - PubMed
  18. Minerva Stomatol. 2007 Jun;56(6):341-7 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Cancer. 2006 Apr;42(6):717-27 - PubMed
  20. Anticancer Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5B):3661-6 - PubMed
  21. Oral Oncol. 2001 Feb;37(2):164-71 - PubMed
  22. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Apr;22(2):109-11 - PubMed
  23. Laryngoscope. 2005 Apr;115(4):690-8 - PubMed
  24. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep;15(9):1319-29 - PubMed
  25. Harefuah. 2005 Apr;144(4):243-5, 304, 303 - PubMed
  26. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005 Jul;54(7):671-6 - PubMed
  27. Oncol Rep. 2006 Aug;16(2):329-34 - PubMed
  28. J Oral Pathol Med. 2004 Jan;33(1):30-6 - PubMed
  29. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007 Oct;58(8):341-6 - PubMed
  30. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jun;43(3):253-5 - PubMed
  31. J Biol Chem. 2002 Oct 11;277(41):38159-67 - PubMed
  32. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1993 Mar;43(3):99-106 - PubMed
  33. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998 May;122(5):447-54 - PubMed
  34. Anal Cell Pathol. 1989 Feb;1(1):25-39 - PubMed

Publication Types