Display options
Share it on

Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Nov;116(11):1568-75. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11516. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

Meeting report: moving upstream-evaluating adverse upstream end points for improved risk assessment and decision-making.

Environmental health perspectives

Tracey J Woodruff, Lauren Zeise, Daniel A Axelrad, Kathryn Z Guyton, Sarah Janssen, Mark Miller, Gregory G Miller, Jackie M Schwartz, George Alexeeff, Henry Anderson, Linda Birnbaum, Frederic Bois, Vincent James Cogliano, Kevin Crofton, Susan Y Euling, Paul M D Foster, Dori R Germolec, Earl Gray, Dale B Hattis, Amy D Kyle, Robert W Luebke, Michael I Luster, Chris Portier, Deborah C Rice, Gina Solomon, John Vandenberg, R Thomas Zoeller

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 19057713 PMCID: PMC2592280 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11516

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing adverse effects from environmental chemical exposure is integral to public health policies. Toxicology assays identifying early biological changes from chemical exposure are increasing our ability to evaluate links between early biological disturbances and subsequent overt downstream effects. A workshop was held to consider how the resulting data inform consideration of an "adverse effect" in the context of hazard identification and risk assessment.

OBJECTIVES: Our objective here is to review what is known about the relationships between chemical exposure, early biological effects (upstream events), and later overt effects (downstream events) through three case studies (thyroid hormone disruption, antiandrogen effects, immune system disruption) and to consider how to evaluate hazard and risk when early biological effect data are available.

DISCUSSION: Each case study presents data on the toxicity pathways linking early biological perturbations with downstream overt effects. Case studies also emphasize several factors that can influence risk of overt disease as a result from early biological perturbations, including background chemical exposures, underlying individual biological processes, and disease susceptibility. Certain effects resulting from exposure during periods of sensitivity may be irreversible. A chemical can act through multiple modes of action, resulting in similar or different overt effects.

CONCLUSIONS: For certain classes of early perturbations, sufficient information on the disease process is known, so hazard and quantitative risk assessment can proceed using information on upstream biological perturbations. Upstream data will support improved approaches for considering developmental stage, background exposures, disease status, and other factors important to assessing hazard and risk for the whole population.

Keywords: adverse health effects; androgen antagonists; hazard identification; immunotoxicants; risk assessment; science policy; thyroid hormone; toxicologic assessments

References

  1. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2005 Jun;74(3):277-85 - PubMed
  2. Ann Oncol. 2002;13 Suppl 4:165-9 - PubMed
  3. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2006 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-26 - PubMed
  4. Int J Androl. 2008 Apr;31(2):241-8 - PubMed
  5. Arch Environ Health. 2001 Nov-Dec;56(6):485-92 - PubMed
  6. PLoS Med. 2006 Aug;3(8):e311 - PubMed
  7. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Jun;73(2):431-41 - PubMed
  8. Thyroid. 2007 Dec;17(12):1211-23 - PubMed
  9. Epidemiology. 2006 Nov;17(6):682-91 - PubMed
  10. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Nov;85(11):3975-87 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):906-7 - PubMed
  12. Pediatrics. 2003 Oct;112(4):923-30 - PubMed
  13. Toxicol Lett. 2004 Feb 2;146(3):207-15 - PubMed
  14. Biol Reprod. 2005 Jul;73(1):180-92 - PubMed
  15. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jul 6;321(1):13-6 - PubMed
  16. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Mar;108(3):205-11 - PubMed
  17. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Feb;59:31-6 - PubMed
  18. Toxicol Sci. 2000 May;55(1):143-51 - PubMed
  19. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1301-5 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Mar;87(3):1068-72 - PubMed
  21. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 29;325(9):606-12 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar;92(3):841-5 - PubMed
  23. Int J Androl. 2008 Apr;31(2):209-23 - PubMed
  24. Thyroid. 2005 Jul;15(7):692-9 - PubMed
  25. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Nov;113(11):1549-54 - PubMed
  26. Chemosphere. 1998 Oct-Nov;37(9-12):1855-65 - PubMed
  27. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003 Sep;59(3):282-8 - PubMed
  28. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Dec;108(12):1203-7 - PubMed
  29. Int J Androl. 2008 Apr;31(2):249-62 - PubMed
  30. Toxicol Sci. 2000 Dec;58(2):350-65 - PubMed
  31. Toxicology. 2006 Jan 5;217(1):22-30 - PubMed
  32. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(3):331-8 - PubMed
  33. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 19;341(8):549-55 - PubMed
  34. Toxicology. 1999 Aug 13;136(1):15-26 - PubMed
  35. J Pediatr. 2005 Dec;147(6):775-80 - PubMed
  36. Annu Rev Physiol. 1991;53:415-40 - PubMed
  37. Int J Androl. 2006 Feb;29(1):96-104; discussion 105-8 - PubMed
  38. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007 Feb;156(2):181-6 - PubMed
  39. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug;113(8):1056-61 - PubMed
  40. Dev Biol. 2004 Jun 1;270(1):1-18 - PubMed
  41. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Sep;110(9):927-37 - PubMed
  42. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Feb;114(2):270-6 - PubMed
  43. Am J Med. 2006 Jul;119(7):541-51 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support