Display options
Share it on

J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Dec;15(6):506-11. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000600010.

Effect of a post-polymerization treatments on the flexural strength and Vickers hardness of reline and acrylic denture base resins.

Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB

Rosangela Seiko Seo, Carlos Eduardo Vergani, Eunice Teresinha Giampaolo, Ana Claudia Pavarina, Ana Lucia Machado

Affiliations

  1. Dental School, University of Várzea Grande, Várzea Grande, MT, Brazil.

PMID: 19089189 PMCID: PMC4327500 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000600010

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of water-bath and microwave post-polymerization treatments on the flexural strength and Vickers hardness of four autopolymerizing reline resins (Duraliner II-D, Kooliner-K, Tokuso Rebase Fast-TR and Ufi Gel Hard C-UGH) and one heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 550-L), processed using two polymerization cycles (short cycle - 90 minutes at 73 degrees C and 100 degrees C for 30 minutes; and long cycle - 9 hours at 71 degrees C). For each material, thirty specimens (64 x 10 x 3.3 mm) were made and divided into 3 groups (n=10). Specimens were tested after: processing (control group); water-bath at 55 degrees C for 10 minutes (reline materials) or 60 minutes (L); and microwave irradiation. Flexural strength tests were performed at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min using a three-point bending device with a span of 50 mm. The flexural strengths values were calculated in MPa. One fragment of each specimen was submitted to Vickers hardness test. Data were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (alpha=0.05). L microwaved specimens (short cycle) exhibited significantly higher flexural strength means than its respective control group (p<0.05). Water-bath promoted a significant increase (p<0.05) in flexural strength of K and L (long cycle). The hardness of the tested materials was not influenced by the post-polymerization treatments. Post-polymerization treatments could be used to improve the flexural strength of some materials tested.

References

  1. Biomaterials. 1982 Jul;3(3):155-9 - PubMed
  2. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):363-8 - PubMed
  3. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996 Jun;54(3):188-92 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Rehabil. 1994 Nov;21(6):641-8 - PubMed
  5. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jun;89(6):598-602 - PubMed
  6. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Feb;93(2):171-6 - PubMed
  7. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Oct;26(10):804-8 - PubMed
  8. Aust Dent J. 1999 Mar;44(1):25-30 - PubMed
  9. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982 Sep;16(5):741-54 - PubMed
  10. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jul;30(7):749-52 - PubMed
  11. J Dent. 1991 Aug;19(4):245-8 - PubMed
  12. J Dent. 1992 Dec;20(6):370-4 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):179-83 - PubMed
  14. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Aug;27(8):690-6 - PubMed
  15. J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7):420-6 - PubMed
  16. Dent Mater. 1995 Nov;11(6):338-42 - PubMed
  17. J Dent. 1983 Mar;11(1):80-8 - PubMed
  18. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):508-12 - PubMed
  19. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):577-83 - PubMed
  20. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Dec;86(6):613-9 - PubMed
  21. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Jun;71(6):618-24 - PubMed
  22. Br Dent J. 1999 Oct 9;187(7):350-2 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2003 Dec;11(4):157-63 - PubMed
  24. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998 Feb;106(1):588-93 - PubMed
  25. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Jul;28(7):640-4 - PubMed
  26. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Jan;73(1):55-9 - PubMed

Publication Types